Recent content by SkewbIsTheBestEvent

Yeah 2x2ers are just weird lol You see perfect solves and then they are like, "Nah I could've turned faster" 💀

CubingUSA said this:

Ignacy Samselski 1.52 Skewb Avg:

Moreso than 3x3 R1 would happen but everyone could qualify for R2 I especially like this for clock since it allows faster competitors who use 7-simul to DNF without worrying of making the next round.

It was on stream (clicky studios) and AJW will probably upload it too on his channel

Zayn 0.97 2x2 Avg, WR BPA

Correct me if I'm wrong, I think what your saying is that the state of the misscramble compared the original doesn't matter, whether it was easier or harder. I think that misscrambles that are a move off (like in Antoni's case) should stand because of how close it is to the original scramble...

So your saying it is fairer to give a competitor an entirely DIFFERENT scramble than the original? (which could be way more difficult or easier from the original compared to the misscramble which is only slightly more difficult or easier than the original) My argument isn't that it should stand...

Not sure how that works though (maybe he doesn't give it back, or maybe the payments haven't been given yet)

My problem is that Antoni is being punished for getting a HARDER scramble than the actual one. If you read the WCA forum page on this, it was said that competitors for SOME (not all) finals could check their scrambles, but it should never be their obligation to do so. It just doesn't make sense...

I want to know why you think this

Thats fair but in my opinion Full CN allows you to take advantage of really easy starts

Full is worth it if you plan to become world class

Here is what I found: z2 L' U' L U' F2 U2 F' (F2L minus a cross edge) U2 L R' F' L' R (F2L + EO) ZB: R' U' R U' R2 D' R U2 R' D R2 U Final Solution: z2 L' U' L U' F2 U2 F' U2 L R' F' L' U' R U' R2 D' R U2 R' D R2 U 23 Move Solution Linearly with 3 minutes (and Speedcubedb to find the zb) is...