Sa967St
Not A Moderator
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2008
- Messages
- 3,793
- Location
- Waterloo, ON, Canada
- WCA ID
- 2007STRO01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
It ain't that hard to get high 3 NL. But that single was .21 so good luck
The lowest movecount for NL solve for Sarah's would be around 15 (FL - 3, CLL+U -4, L4C - 8), for Ranzha's propably the same, and for Hideki Niina method even more (considering U center skip as lucky solve). So no, it's not, unless you could 1look such a solve (who the hell can 1look 15 moves solution on skewb?)
I've had several one-look solves, all of which were 13-14 moves. They had 1-2 move first layers, and I was able to predict the rest (they were okay-ish cases).
Mharr's solution had a 4-move first layer then a sledgehammer. Very easy solution, but since he probably saw that it'd be solved after the sledgehammer, it's arguable whether it was full-step.
Last edited: