[Unofficial] 4.55 3x3 single NL - Chris Olson (Prepared Solve)

[Rubiks560]

Scramble: F2 L2 R2 F' L D F2 R2 F2 R2 F' R B' R' F2 B L2 D' R D' U2 L' B2 D2 R

Cube: 55mm Zhanchi

Rob reconstruct?

 

[ottozing]

wat

 

[XTowncuber]

DNF
A5a) While inspecting or solving the puzzle, the competitor must not communicate with anyone other than the judge. Penalty: disqualification of the attempt (DNF).

but seriously wat

 

[TheDubDubJr]

DNF
A5a) While inspecting or solving the puzzle, the competitor must not communicate with anyone other than the judge. Penalty: disqualification of the attempt (DNF).

but seriously wat

What if I was the judge?

 

[Escher]

Lol 'NL'.

Anyway, nice tps.

 

[kcl]

wat

 

[mrtomas]

Wow. It would've been sub4 if you skipped PLL or OLL

 

[AmazingCuber]

holy ****!!! That is insane!! The scramble . . .

 

[Renslay]

Should it be called as "NL"?

 

[Brest]

Christopher Olson - 4.55 3x3 single (unofficial)

Spoiler: Video

[youtubehd]ShdadM8TLG8[/youtubehd]

F2 L2 R2 F' L D F2 R2 F2 R2 F' R B' R' F2 B L2 D' R D' U2 L' B2 D2 R

x2 y' // inspection
r U' r' F U' R' // XXcross
y R U2 R' U' R U' R' U R U' R' // 3rd pair
y U' R U2 R' U' R U R' // 4th pair
U' r U2 R' U' R U' r' // OLL
U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' // PLL
View at alg.garron.us

[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	4.55	47	10.33	49	10.77	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
Cross+1	0.64	6	9.37	6	9.37		Cross+1/F2L	25.6%	24.0%	22.2%
F2L	2.50	25	10.00	27	10.80		F2L/Total	54.9%	53.2%	55.1%
LL	2.05	22	10.73	22	10.73		LL/Total	45.1%	46.8%	44.9%

 

[scottishcuber]

[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	4.55	47	10.33	49	10.77	[/COLOR]

10.33tps (10.77etps) ... WTF!

 

[Tim Major]

Should it be called as "NL"?

Ofcourse it should, it's an "NL" single so why not call it that?

 

[scottishcuber]

Ofcourse it should, it's an "NL" single so why not call it that?

I'd be feeling quite lucky if I got a scramble with an easy X-cross (or XX-), then some pretty good F2L cases, then a fast OLL and a J-perm. In fact I got something kinda similar on cam, with an identical LL...and I felt lucky. I called it full-step.

 

[Escher]

I called it full-step.

The above^. The term 'non-lucky' is ancient and I remember first seeing it on a post on the old Yahoo message board from Ron, specifically referring to getting his personal best time without any lucky elements, i.e. accidental pair skips, OLL/PLL skips. There's a reason we have a clear distinction between 'NL' and 'full step'!

This is a lucky full-step solve; that doesn't detract from it still being very much an awesome solve.

 

[AmazingCuber]

lol.
practiced this and got 5.20

 

[Rubiks560]

Suppose I better post this now since I'll be busy for a while

Announcement:

This is a prepared solve.

I did this for this thread: http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?45821-6-03-3x3-Single-(last-layer-skip to prove how it is NOT hard to fake a solve at all. This took almost 0 effort to do. I won't say how I did so people won't do it in the future, but its probably fairly obvious anyway.

I meant no real dishonesty. Just trying to prove a point

Edit: also NL was a playon words for 'Not legit'

 

[Antonie faz fan]

lol chris

 

[kcl]

Suppose I better post this now since I'll be busy for a while

Announcement:

This is a prepared solve.

I did this for this thread: http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?45821-6-03-3x3-Single-(last-layer-skip to prove how it is NOT hard to fake a solve at all. This took almost 0 effort to do. I won't say how I did so people won't do it in the future, but its probably fairly obvious anyway.

I meant no real dishonesty. Just trying to prove a point

Didn't say it was difficult lol. Just that it doesn't really seem like she would do it.

 

[Rubiks560]

Didn't say it was difficult lol. Just that it doesn't really seem like she would do it.

I never pointed at you, now did I?

 

[kcl]

I never pointed at you, now did I?

Touché . I shall now call any sub SR solve by you prepared XD