Tim Wong: 12/14 MBLD, 55:35 (Almost NAR)

samchoochiu

Veteran
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
252
WCA ID
2010CHIU01
YouTube
Visit Channel
My friend Tim attempted to break the NAR for MBLD last Saturday at our competition. Although he didn't get the record, I am very impressed by him. Both attempts were 12/14 and the second attempt was 20 seconds faster. This is also the most number of cubes attempted in North America. Tim started practicing BLD for the first time in the Winter and attempted 3MBLD in February so he has improved very quickly by any standard.

Here's the video, enjoy!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First off, Congrats!

If you count the old Multi results, I'm pretty sure 30+ cubes have been attempted in North America. I am also fairly sure Corey Sakowski has attempted 15 cubes in competition under the new Multi-BLD regs.
 
Last edited:
First off, Congrats!

If you count the old Multi results, I'm pretty sure 30+ cubes have been attempted in North America. I am also fairly sure Corey Sakowski has attempted 15 cubes in competition under the new Multi-BLD regs.

Apologies! You are probably right on the old MBLD results, I wasn't sure since I didn't know how to access that information. And I just looked up Corey and he has done a 8/11 so far.
 
Nice accomplishment!

If you count the old Multi results, I'm pretty sure 30+ cubes have been attempted in North America. I am also fairly sure Corey Sakowski has attempted 15 cubes in competition under the new Multi-BLD regs.

Apologies! You are probably right on the old MBLD results, I wasn't sure since I didn't know how to access that information. And I just looked up Corey and he has done a 8/11 so far.

Rowe tried 33 under the old rules (got 19/33 at Nationals the last year of the old rules; he also got 22/30 earlier). I tried 14 once under the new rules, and failed miserably (8/14). I was afraid to try again, so I just went for 12 on the second attempt.
 
Nice! :tu

A bit off topic, I am wondering why some top multibld (I also think of Maskow) put their "solved" cubes randomly on the side. If you realize you did something wrong or just forgot something, you are screwed, just because you cannot pick up that cube again...
 
Nice! :tu

A bit off topic, I am wondering why some top multibld (I also think of Maskow) put their "solved" cubes randomly on the side. If you realize you did something wrong or just forgot something, you are screwed, just because you cannot pick up that cube again...

ain't nobody got time fo dat
 
Nice! :tu

A bit off topic, I am wondering why some top multibld (I also think of Maskow) put their "solved" cubes randomly on the side. If you realize you did something wrong or just forgot something, you are screwed, just because you cannot pick up that cube again...

No need to nicely group the solved cubes:
If you think it is solved there is no need to go back to it and you can toss it to the side...
If you know you're missing something on a particular cube you can put it in a specific place.
 
Back
Top