SS (sunstern)

Status
Not open for further replies.
yeah i just find it ridiculous that he posted something on here trying to like hide his method or something lol.

hmmm trying to hide his method... reminds me of someone i know...
his name was like....
Katyas Muti or something... :p

JK :p
 
yeah i just find it ridiculous that he posted something on here trying to like hide his method or something lol.

hmmm trying to hide his method... reminds me of someone i know...
his name was like....
Katyas Muti or something... :p

JK :p

I laughed for about 5 seconds!

You know what i think, i think that you should make a layer, then use COLL to get a PLL skip every time.

THat would be very fast.
 
yeah i just find it ridiculous that he posted something on here trying to like hide his method or something lol.

hmmm trying to hide his method... reminds me of someone i know...
his name was like....
Katyas Muti or something... :p

JK :p

Basically, a lot of people don't realize it's an expert method. I don't like the idea of people all learning this method and doing 9sec times.
 
yeah i just find it ridiculous that he posted something on here trying to like hide his method or something lol.

hmmm trying to hide his method... reminds me of someone i know...
his name was like....
Katyas Muti or something... :p

JK :p

Basically, a lot of people don't realize it's an expert method. I don't like the idea of people all learning this method and doing 9sec times.

hehe I want to learn it now! I suck at 2x2 I'll get 9s times easy!
wuts the wr? i wunt to b fast lik u.
 
yeah i just find it ridiculous that he posted something on here trying to like hide his method or something lol.

hmmm trying to hide his method... reminds me of someone i know...
his name was like....
Katyas Muti or something... :p

JK :p

I laughed for about 5 seconds!

You know what i think, i think that you should make a layer, then use COLL to get a PLL skip every time.

THat would be very fast.

THATS WHAT I DO :D
 
Why are the advance methods just a combination/simplification of the regulars ones?

Like:

Ortega -> OFOTA
Guimond -> SS
COLL -> EG
 
Why are the advance methods just a combination/simplification of the regulars ones?

Like:

Ortega -> OFOTA
Guimond -> SS
COLL -> EG

I would say both Ortega and Guimond combined lead to both OFOTA and SS, while COLL + Ortega leads to EG.

Would you like to suggest an advanced method that DOESN'T have a simpler counterpart?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top