My Apology

Really? Has it ever happened to you?

Getting the same scramble? All the time.
Getting a DNF? No, but I've never been wrong when I complained about a duplicated scramble. I've been told (by a delegate), that not being right might result in a DNF, though. And I understand why that is the case. When you complain you basically ask for a new scramble: If it turns out that the cube was in fact scrambled correctly they can't give it back to you since then you'd have more than 15 seconds of inspection. So the only other choice they have is to scramble it differently. If you always do this when you get a bad scramble you'll gain an advantage over the other competitors.
 
Really? Has it ever happened to you? I don't think that wrongly, but in good faith, reporting a duplicate scramble should ever result in a DNF. In the worst case, you get the reverse scramble. But, do correct me if I'm wrong.

It has happened before. I'd imagine that some person might take advantage of it by requesting a reverse scramble if they inspected and found a particular scramble had a bad cross/first step.
 
Perhaps we could somehow design a system that makes repeat scrambles basically impossible. The trick would be to (a) isolate the scrambles so a scrambler can't do the wrong one, and (b) make sure the judges don't forget to write down a result. Here are a few ideas.


1) Have the judge do the scrambling right there, perhaps with some kind of opaque thing they can slide over the scramble sheet to make sure they never accidentally use the wrong move sequence. Of course this only works with short puzzles (where the scramble only takes a little time), and requires the judge to be a cuber.

2) A bit more involved: have a separate scrambling area for each solve - maybe a table, maybe just a makeshift cubby or booth - and a separate scrambler for each one, who only has the one scramble. The judge would have to keep track of which scramble number they are on, and either return it to the next booth or tell the runner what number that solve was, but assuming they did that it would be foolproof.

3) Set up a computer system where you select the competitor's name from a dropdown box or something, and select the event, and it pops up their next scramble. The computer would keep track of which one has been done so nobody else has to. We'd have to have a good user interface that makes it easy to get 2+ scrambles for the same person in a row, and also makes it hard to accidentally skip someone's scramble. The problem here is making it work with multiple human scramblers at once without messing up.
 
@#2: if there were 5 booths with one scrambler in each, the runner only has to look at the paper to see what number the last solve had and add 1 to that number to know where the cube should be taken to.

@#3: hook a computer up with a Lego robot and have a barcode for each solver=no mistakes.
 
Last edited:
@#2: if there were 5 booths with one scrambler in each, the runner only has to look at the paper to see what number the last solve had and add 1 to that number to know where the cube should be taken to.
I'm thinking they'd personally ask the judge.

@#3: hook a computer up with a Lego robot and have a barcode for each solver=no mistakes.
Robotic scramblers are very slow and can't easily handle multiple sizes/types of cube, and it would also take a crazy amount of work to get them made, programmed, and properly set up for competitions.
 
Back
Top