Substep Competition

Round 3

F2L 2H
Average of 12: 11.01
9.65, (8.77), 12.59, 10.36, 10.83, (15.43), 11.52, 11.47, 12.13, 10.02, 11.13, 10.44

LL 2H
Average of 12: 5.65
4.84, 4.75, (3.94), 7.28+, 6.03, (11.61), 5.83, 5.09, 6.75, 6.25, 4.40, 5.30

F2B 2H
Average of 12: 8.06
8.40, 8.13, 6.96, 8.34, 8.71, (11.34), 8.08, 9.38, 7.33, (6.78), 7.90, 7.40

F2B OH
Average of 5: 17.01
(22.06), 16.50, (13.59), 20.34, 14.19

L10P 2H
Average of 12: 7.01
8.22, 6.78, (23.25), 7.19, 6.84, 5.84, 6.25, 7.19, 7.22, (5.65), 7.94+, 6.65

L10P OH
Average of 5: 19.36
21.27, 17.52, (11.16), 19.28, (34.56)
 
sneaklyfox said:
Hey already1329, if you don't mind my asking... any special thing with the numbers "1329" because I notice your youtube has "1328". Just wondering why.
Click to expand...

When I first started using "1328", it was because I liked the numbers 13 and 28. When I made an account on Speedsolving.com, I couldn't make it "1328" for a reason, (sorry, I can't tell you the exact reason, but it was impossible to make it "1328") so I used "1329", the next number.
 
ROUND 3:

F2L 2H
Average of 12: 11.91
11.47, 10.03, 12.14, 12.69, 13.31, 9.91, 12.61, 12.53, (9.06), 10.71, (14.49), 13.67

LL 2H
Average of 12: 4.60
3.80, 4.67, 3.73, 4.96, (5.87), 4.74, 3.92, 4.63, 5.83, 4.78, (3.43), 4.94

F2L OH
Average of 12: 17.84
15.19, (14.89), (21.46), 21.34, 18.00, 16.72, 17.21, 18.02, 18.65, 17.91, 16.99, 18.35

LL OH
Average of 12: 7.72
7.55, 7.23, 9.50, 8.08, 8.71, 6.69, (3.16), (10.67), 9.75, 8.12, 5.34, 6.29
 
Round 3:

F2L 2H:
avg=14.48
13.56, 14.56 (wv), 15.21, 14.93, 14.49, 13.19, 14.44, 12.40, 15.22, 15.36, 15.01, 14.22
(zzoh)

F2L OH:
avg=14.63
13.17, 15.49, 14.24, 12.55, 14.34, 18.26, 15.76 (wv), 14.82, 15.13, 13.05, 16.32, 13.96
(zzoh)

LL 2H:
avg=DNF
DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF
(zzoh, but every single scramble was an impossible last layer state)

LL OH:
avg=DNF
DNF, 9.76, 6.56, DNF, DNF, DNF, 3.77, DNF, DNF, DNF, 4.39, DNF
(zzoh, similar reason)
 
mDiPalma said:
Round 3:

LL 2H:
avg=DNF
DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF, DNF
(zzoh, but every single scramble was an impossible last layer state)

LL OH:
avg=DNF
DNF, 9.76, 6.56, DNF, DNF, DNF, 3.77, DNF, DNF, DNF, 4.39, DNF
(zzoh, similar reason)
Click to expand...

Why didn't you just use 2L OLL to get to the all edges oriented state, and then do what you would normally do (whether that be OCLL/PLL or COLL/EPLL)?
 
ThomasJE said:
Why didn't you just use 2L OLL to get to the all edges oriented state, and then do what you would normally do (whether that be OCLL/PLL or COLL/EPLL)?
Click to expand...

because that wouldn't be representative of my actual solve time for that substep.
 
F2B 2H (for lulz):

21.91, 24.64, 15.73, 17.27, (35.16), 25.67, 11.73, 14.72, 9.19, 12.74, (9.09), 18.56 = 17.22

You can see improvement as I got towards the end because I don't even use Roux...

F2L 2H(ZZ):

11.19, 11.94, 9.19, 11.95, 10.16, 9.06, (20.55), 9.33, (8.38), 13.13, 9.28, 10.50 = 10.57

F2L OH(ZZ):

25.55, 24.44, 24.28, 28.59, (22.50), 28.58, 25.72, 23.77, 27.42, 24.89, (34.61), 23.30 = 25.65
 
mDiPalma said:
because that wouldn't be representative of my actual solve time for that substep.
Click to expand...

Yeah... But you could argue that using inspection won't represent your L10P/LL time. I do get your point though.

already1329 said:
EO > Start Inspection > Start Timer > Solve >Stop Timer
Click to expand...

I would have thought of:
Start Inspection > Start Timer > EO > ZZLL > Stop Timer

sneaklyfox said:
Maybe what ThomasJE meant was that you would use the 2-look OLL alg to get the edges all oriented first. Then inspect, start timer, and solve the rest of it. Or is someone out there wanting last slot scrambles?
Click to expand...

I could add ZBLL scrambles for ZZLL if enough people would want it.

already1329 said:
EOLine: Normal 3x3x3 scrambles
ZZF2L: 3-generator <R,U,L> scrambles
ZZLL: ZBLL scrambles
Click to expand...

For EO and ZZF2L, you could combine them and use the F2L scrambles. If you stated the fact you were doing ZZF2L, then we could put you in a separate category. The only thing I would be apprehensive about is that there may be some people that may want to train CFOP and ZZ.

So, ZZ users - would you want ZZLL scrambles? And would you want them for OH as well as 2H?

Also, is there anyone that would want to train both CFOP/Petrus F2L and ZZF2L?
 
Round 3

F2L OH
Average: 20.76
20.09, 19.97, 21.89, 23.05, 19.37, 20.40, 20.01, 19.47, (23.57), 23.14, 20.18, (17.06)

Blech.

LL OH
Average: 8.58
10.11, 6.49, 9.31, (13.60), 10.58, 9.06, (3.49), 10.34, 10.05, 9.01, 4.84, 5.98

Uncommonly good. Two of them started out as OLL skips.
 
Round 3 Results

ROUND 3 IS NOW CLOSED.

F2L 2H
1. god of rubic 2 10.15
2. uvafan 10.57 (zz)
3. already1329 11.01
4. Outsmash 11.91
5. khoavo12 12.74
6. mDiPalma 14.48 (zzoh)
7. MarcelP 19.33

F2L OH
1. mDiPalma 14.63 (zzoh)
2. Outsmash 17.84
3. sneaklyfox 20.76
4. uvafan 25.65 (zz)

LL 2H
1. Outsmash 4.60
2. god of rubic 2 5.16
3. already1329 5.65
4. khoavo12 5.71
5. MarcelP 9.92
6. mDiPalma DNF (zzoh)

LL OH
1. Outsmash 7.72
2. sneaklyfox 8.58
3. mDiPalma DNF (zzoh)

F2B 2H
1. already1329 8.06
2. uvafan 17.22

F2B OH
1. already1329 17.01

L10P 2H
1. already1329 7.01

L10P OH
1. already1329 19.36

Congratulations go to god of rubic 2, mDiPalma, Outsmash, and already1329!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

rubikmaster
Substep Competition Reopened
Replies
1
Views
912
rubikmaster
rubikmaster
mark49152
New CFOP Substep Competition
12 13 14
Replies
262
Views
26,069
pipkiksass
pipkiksass
D
The physics of Rubik's Cube to Substep Method Platform
2
Replies
33
Views
1,786
Christopher Mowla
Christopher Mowla
D
Incomplete Substep Method LL Megaminx
Replies
2
Views
299
Deleted member 27249
D
Dane man
Calculating Method/Substep Efficiency
2
Replies
27
Views
8,640
brododragon
brododragon
Back
Top