[Unofficial] 14.52 non luckly single 3x3 with Reconstruction

[tx789]

Aneurin Hunt (unoffical) fullstep (14.52)

Scramble: F2 D' B2 D2 L2 U R2 B2 D' B2 R2 F' R B R' D' L' B L F U'

x2 y' // Inspection
L R U r U2 r' // Cross (6/6)
R U R' y' U R' U2 R d L' L L' U' L // 1st Pair (13/19)
y L' U L y' U R U' R' // 2nd Pair (7/26)
y2 R U' R' U y' R' U R // 3rd Pair (7/33)
y U L' U L y' U R U' R' // 4th Pair (8/41)
R U R' U R U' R' U' R' F R F' // OLL (12/53)
U M'2 U M'2 U M' U2 M'2 U2 M' U // PLL (16/69)
View at alg.garron

[b]Step	Time	HTM	HTPS	ETM	ETPS[/b]
[color="red"]Total	14.52	69	4.75	71	4.89[/color]

Cross+1	4.57	19	4.16	20	4.38
F2L	9.60	41	4.27	48	5.00
LL	4.92	28	5.69	23	4.67

[b]Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/b]
Cross+1/F2L	48%	46%	42%
F2L/Total	66%	59%	68%
LL/Total	34%	41%	32%

 

[ottozing]

I like the way you edited the solve footage with time stamps per step :tu Cool idea!

 

[tx789]

I like the way you edited the solve footage with time stamps per step :tu Cool idea!

I've done with a 2x2 avg not a good one by my standards
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEKU--jFVoQ&list=UUvywjxxTO_ojtaLjRnAJfWA&index=2&feature=plcp

 

[Petro Leum]

your movecount is way to high! nice turningstyle though

 

[tx789]

your movecount is way to high! nice turningstyle though

then what is a good move count

 

[ottozing]

50-60

 

[Brest]

62stm is fine, certainly not "way too high".
Rotations on the other hand, you has too many.

 

[applemobile]

All those unsolved cubes I physically couldn't leave them
Like that.

 

[ottozing]

Another tip. L R U r U2 r' ??? Why not just do L R U F2??? Having a corner solved without it being an Xcross is counter productive.

 

[MarcelP]

Very nice video! I tried the scramble also and had 26 seconds on the first try. That is a very good time for me 14 seconds maybe in three years or so.. LOL

 

[tx789]

Another tip. L R U r U2 r' ??? Why not just do L R U F2??? Having a corner solved without it being an Xcross is counter productive.

If I can solve corners I do and of course x crosses

 

[JasonK]

If I can solve corners I do and of course x crosses

But why? Solving a corner without an edge just makes uglier cases for later - it's usually better not to.

 

[tx789]

But why? Solving a corner without an edge just makes uglier cases for later - it's usually better not to.

lookahead you only need to find or track the edge

 

[ottozing]

But the F2L case itself is worse. There is no reason why you couldn't have just as good lookahead without preserving corners. You can't go wrong with fixing bad habits.

 

[tx789]

But the F2L case itself is worse. There is no reason why you couldn't have just as good lookahead without preserving corners. You can't go wrong with fixing bad habits.

It not that badder a case inserting a edge with a solved corner ins't that bad only when other pairs are above the corner then you use small u

habits can be hard to break

 

[ottozing]

Trust me, it's worth breaking the habit. Anything that make's you slower insn't worth doing (With the only "exception" being switching to full CN simply because breaking THAT habit is bat-shyt difficult XD )

 

[JasonK]

habits can be hard to break

like not using punctuation

but seriously its important to break habits now if you keep doing slow stuff its just going to hurt you in the long run like how many moves does it take to insert an edge it can add up in the end but do whatever you want