A perm (cw) In 0.47 seconds

[ThomasJE]

Believing something doesn't make it correct.

But we can't be 100% sure of the correct answer.

 

[Kirjava]

But we can't be 100% sure of the correct answer.

It is known beyond reasonable doubt that the tps is around 16 and not 19.

 

[Ickenicke]

But we can't be 100% sure of the correct answer.

But counting frames is probably more exact than stackmat timing.

 

[Ickenicke]

It is hard to stop the timer perfect.

 

[DrKorbin]

Though wlstjd2145's TPS is amazing, it seems to me that he began to apply moves before he lifted his hands up from the timer. This can be a reason why Stefan's time and stackmat result are different. Or am I wrong?

 

[qqwref]

That's because you believe Stefan's time.

Belief doesn't factor into it (IIRC this isn't a theological debate). Since we don't know the exact number, the best answer we have is the one which we got with the most precise measurement, i.e. Stefan's technique. If you disagree with that, you're simply wrong.


PS: This topic is a good demonstration of why nobody seriously keeps track of PLL UWRs.

 

[insane569]

Though wlstjd2145's TPS is amazing, it seems to me that he began to apply moves before he lifted his hands up from the timer. This can be a reason why Stefan's time and stackmat result are different. Or am I wrong?

That's what I was thinking. If a small move/turn was made before the timer started(not on purpose, it's hard to make sure the timer is running at the same time you start the alg so going by frames is more accurate)then the time would be shorter and his TPS would be higher.

 

[Stefan]

But we can't be 100% sure of the correct answer.

We can be 100% sure there is one correct answer. Not two different ones.

 

[samehsameh]

he does about 2 moves before his hands even leave the timer. Also i would say its 17 frames (0.56s) and definately in the range 0.53s - 0.6s

 

[Robocopter87]

Amazing A perm.

Stefan vs. ThomasJE is like Albert Einstein vs. Barbie.

 

[Czery]

We can be 100% sure there is one correct answer. Not two different ones.

Isn't this obvious?

People should do PLL times the way they do magic's. Then they can work on how fast they can pick up a cube.

 

[StachuK1992]

Then we still have problems of "ZOMG HE STOPPED WITH HIS WRISTS GUYS!!"

 

[Cheese11]

Kay guys, even if it is .57 seconds, it's still fricken' awesome! The TPS blows my socks off, and I'm not even wearing any!

 

[Cool Frog]

I wish I could D2 =(

SO FAST.

 

[insane569]

I wish I could D2 =(

SO FAST.

D2 is the new M2.

 

[Rpotts]

Left ring-pinky is where it's at, though tons of people seem to be super fast with ring-ring. I dun get it.

 

[speedpicker]

Does anyone know for sure whether this is ring then pinky or pinky then ring?

 

[Escher]

Isn't this obvious?

People should do PLL times the way they do magic's. Then they can work on how fast they can pick up a cube.

This is what Ravi has been saying for ages, iirc...

It's fun to try, really really hard to get sub 1 with a lot of PLLs, I've managed with J and A only.

 

[Kirjava]

I've never seen someone sub1 a stackmat PLL, or even heard of it happening. I keep trying to get Breandan to do it.

 

[wlstjd2145]

Um, I agree that the tps is around 16 since I saw the vid in slow motion
I think you don't need to be confused anymore.