[WCA Regulations 2012] Proposed: Alternative formats for 3x3x3 BLD

aronpm said:
Do I think an average of 5 should be used for 3BLD? Yes, I do. However, not yet.
Click to expand...

:D You're the first person I've seen make this argument other than me. I guess I hadn't thought about how important it would be to have the experience in competition - that makes this argument make even more sense.

I made this argument at least a year ago - that we would eventually get where all the best people are getting almost all solves successful, so there will suddenly be little resistance to going with averages. Back then, no one else seemed to believe me.

I think when we get where the best people have all put the "magical" 10,000 hours into 3x3x3 BLD, they'll practically never miss (maybe I won't have trouble with that average 98/100 by then), and it will just be silly to argue against averages. But I believe that could still be quite a few years from now - 5 to 10 years - far enough away that it's almost impossible to speculate accurately.
 
aronpm said:
I agree with Mike, I would like to see an average for BLD introduced now, but only for statistics, not to determine winners (yet!)
Click to expand...

You are missing an important link. If best single counts, everybody will prefer the faster solve against the more safe one... Or at least the fast guys.
They don't care if it is 4/5 or 1/5 if their success solve is fast.

Edit: I mean they will go speed over success rate at all of the 5 solves.
 
bamilan said:
You are missing an important link. If best single counts, everybody will prefer the faster solve against the more safe one... Or at least the fast guys.
They don't care if it is 4/5 or 1/5 if their success solve is fast.

Edit: I mean they will go speed over success rate at all of the 5 solves.
Click to expand...

To own or to beat the average WR would be attractive for the fast bld cubers. That would be a very respectable WR to own. I think they would care.
 
I agree with Milan, introducing best of 5 will just make it a further speed contest with more chance to stuff up. It won't improve the accuracy of blindsolvers at all. Skip that stage and go straight to average or don't change it at all.
 
and even if not.. who cares? you will leave the competition knowing that u had the best average and are ranked whatever in the world with it. that's totally fine for me as long as it finds its way into the database. just "losing" the data because of a best of 5 series seems like missing out on something.
 
Dene said:
I agree with Milan, introducing best of 5 will just make it a further speed contest with more chance to stuff up. It won't improve the accuracy of blindsolvers at all. Skip that stage and go straight to average or don't change it at all.
Click to expand...

Why not change it at all? The people favouring the transition are in the minority - most want to change to best of 5 and leave it like that.
 
Sorry that statement was a bit of a hyperbole. I favour changing either way, but don't really see any reason to favour best of 5 over average of 5.
 
The main issue being raised is how BLD should not be treated like 3x3x3, as the nature of the event is different.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't seen anyone really press that issue to be honest. I haven't thought too much about it, but just off the top of my head, one argument in favour of an average is that, while there is a larger margin for error in bld solving, consistency should still be a goal, even if not as important as raw speed. This is because, without consistency, successes would be few and far between (or at least, not enough for one to be considered a top bld contender). I would be interested to know the history of top bld solvers and their success rates, but probably not worth anyones time to work it out.
 
Top 4 333bf success

Dene said:
I would be interested to know the history of top bld solvers and their success rates, but probably not worth anyones time to work it out.
Click to expand...

Code: 
WCA_ID		3's	2's	1's	0's	Total	% 3's	% 3's (last 3 rounds)
2007XUYU01	1	6	14	4	25	4%	0%
2008CASI01	2	2	1	0	5	40%	33%
2008ZHUA01	2	12	16	10	40	5%	0%
2010CARN01	2	5	7	1	15	13%	67%

2007XUYU01
2, 1, 2, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 3, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0

2008CASI01
1, 2, 3, 2, 3

2008ZHUA01
1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 2, 2, 1, 3, 1, 3, 2, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0, 0

2010CARN01
3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 2, 1

This information was just scraped from the WCA result pages. It'd be better to actually query "333bf" events with a "Best of 3" format instead to get a list of successes.

Tim.
 
bf solvers (ranked by accuracy)

TimMc said:
It'd be better to actually query "333bf" events with a "Best of 3" format instead to get a list of successes.
Click to expand...

bf solvers (ranked by accuracy):
success = 3/3 solved per round (no DNF and no DNS) (i.e. successful round)
excluding competitors with 0%

Code: 
personId	success	rounds	accuracy
2010LIUR02	1	1	100.00%
2011LONG02	1	1	100.00%
2010MLLE02	1	1	100.00%
2009BOUL03	1	1	100.00%
2010KURN03	1	1	100.00%
2009CHAO03	1	1	100.00%
2010MARU01	1	1	100.00%
2011ZAWA01	1	1	100.00%
2011KANA02	1	1	100.00%
2010CHUN04	1	1	100.00%
2011XUZH02	1	1	100.00%
2010HWAN02	1	1	100.00%
2010ADRI01	1	1	100.00%
2008PHEL01	3	5	75.00%
2007HABE01	14	17	70.83%
2009BATT02	3	5	66.67%
2007GOTA01	3	8	56.67%
2007ENDR01	4	10	53.33%
2004GALL02	36	65	50.04%
2010SANC04	1	3	50.00%
2007SEUN02	1	2	50.00%
2011CHEC01	1	2	50.00%
2010ADHI02	1	2	50.00%
2011ZHAN36	1	2	50.00%
2011YULI01	1	2	50.00%
2011ARDI03	1	2	50.00%
2010FATH01	1	2	50.00%
2011CHOI02	2	4	50.00%
2009HONG04	1	2	50.00%
2011OBLA01	1	2	50.00%
2008PEIX01	1	2	50.00%
2010ROJA01	1	2	50.00%
2010PRAJ01	1	2	50.00%
2009KUBO01	3	7	45.00%
2008CASI01	2	5	44.44%
2006KIMB01	2	5	41.67%
2011KOGL01	2	5	40.00%
2006ORLA01	5	12	39.58%
2010WIDO01	2	6	37.50%
2006BUUS01	7	33	35.86%
2010WANG68	2	6	33.33%
2006BITE01	2	5	33.33%
2011ENGB02	1	3	33.33%
2009ROST01	1	9	33.33%
2011WICA01	1	3	33.33%
2010TIAN03	1	3	33.33%
2009ARAM01	1	3	33.33%
2010WUIF01	1	3	33.33%
2010RAMA10	2	4	33.33%
2004FONN01	1	7	33.33%
2009KOZA01	1	4	33.33%
2009NOVI02	1	4	33.33%
2007STRE01	3	7	30.00%
2010MICH03	2	7	29.17%
2005KOCZ01	11	33	28.73%
2008HINL01	2	6	27.78%
2007LUCH02	4	31	26.11%
2008AURO01	14	44	25.28%
2007HUGH01	10	30	25.11%
2011ROHM01	1	4	25.00%
2009AGUS01	1	4	25.00%
2009PUTR07	1	3	25.00%
2008OLLE01	1	5	25.00%
2010REHA01	1	4	25.00%
2008VENK01	1	3	25.00%
2010RICH03	1	3	25.00%
2010YUGI02	1	5	25.00%
2007ROKA01	1	3	25.00%
2011CHAN10	1	4	25.00%
2008HANG01	1	6	25.00%
2003HARD01	4	16	25.00%
2008MCKN01	1	3	25.00%
2003POCH01	3	11	25.00%
2010AZAR01	1	3	25.00%
2010SWAR01	1	6	25.00%
2010DONA01	2	8	25.00%
2009HORM02	1	4	25.00%
2004CHAN01	1	5	25.00%
2010HARI01	1	4	25.00%
2006BURN01	1	10	25.00%
2008TAKA01	2	10	25.00%
2007YUGU01	1	4	25.00%
2009POOK01	1	4	25.00%
2009LIAN03	7	21	24.62%
2007BOUR01	2	12	24.00%
2006GUZE01	3	10	22.92%
2005AKKE01	2	47	22.86%
2009KOUR01	1	5	20.00%
2011FAUZ02	1	5	20.00%
2009YANG06	1	5	20.00%
2010RANI01	1	5	20.00%
2007LIME01	1	21	20.00%
2011MANS02	1	5	20.00%
2004LOLE01	10	47	19.84%
2005BOUC01	1	5	16.67%
2010BOON01	1	5	16.67%
2009YANG31	1	4	16.67%
2009BARB01	1	5	16.67%
2010DAVI06	1	6	16.67%
2009FEAN01	2	9	16.67%
2008MAPE01	2	9	16.67%
2007DANY01	1	6	16.67%
2010ANDE03	1	6	16.67%
2006BYUN01	1	4	16.67%
2010CULL01	1	11	16.67%
2009OKAY01	2	12	16.67%
2010ESPI01	1	5	16.67%
2009PETI01	3	15	16.67%
2010KARY02	1	4	16.67%
2003WINO01	1	8	16.67%
2008VELA01	1	4	16.67%
2010SMIR01	1	5	16.67%
2007SHIR01	2	16	16.67%
2009LASS01	1	7	16.67%
2011SAKO01	1	6	16.67%
2004MAOT02	7	48	14.87%
2008ZHAN13	3	12	14.29%
2008SEPP01	2	14	13.33%
2009GIOR01	1	6	12.50%
2007WAPP01	1	7	12.50%
2010GIRO01	1	5	12.50%
2008BERG04	2	13	12.50%
2007BRIT01	1	5	12.50%
2008LAUR01	3	17	12.50%
2006BARL01	1	7	12.50%
2008LOPE03	1	5	12.50%
2010GRAN02	1	5	12.50%
2010PERE01	1	5	12.50%
2008TURN02	1	11	12.50%
2005LEVI01	1	7	12.50%
2007YUNQ01	5	19	12.27%
2008VARG01	2	17	12.14%
2006TSAO01	2	17	11.67%
2008SKAR01	1	15	11.11%
2009XUAN03	1	15	11.11%
2010BENT01	2	15	11.11%
2009LEAN01	1	9	11.11%
2006YOUN03	3	24	10.86%
2006ROBA01	3	22	10.71%
2009ARSA01	3	21	10.71%
2007YUAL01	3	15	10.00%
2009ANAM01	1	13	10.00%
2009SWEE01	1	7	10.00%
2010CARN01	2	15	10.00%
2007JIPT01	3	18	10.00%
2008TROM01	1	9	10.00%
2008CIRN01	4	29	9.72%
2005LODA01	3	16	9.71%
2008BARA01	4	29	9.70%
2005REYN01	3	46	9.15%
2010PAUL02	1	9	8.33%
2008PUTH01	1	8	8.33%
2006BONN01	1	6	8.33%
2005ZOLN01	4	28	8.33%
2009WANG21	1	7	8.33%
2008YOUN02	1	16	8.33%
2008BUCS01	1	11	8.33%
2009ADIW01	1	11	8.33%
2005GREE02	1	13	8.33%
2007LIBI01	1	9	8.33%
2007KORZ01	1	11	8.33%
2008WONE01	1	12	8.33%
2008SMIT01	2	20	7.14%
2010DESJ01	1	10	7.14%
2004CHAN04	5	61	6.80%
2009WANG62	1	7	6.67%
2009SAEZ01	1	8	6.67%
2007COMP01	1	17	6.67%
2006GALE01	4	44	6.43%
2009CHAN15	1	12	6.25%
2007AGUA01	1	11	6.25%
2007LOPE01	1	9	6.25%
2006FRAN01	1	9	6.25%
2005KOSE01	1	9	6.25%
2007ZHAN03	1	12	6.25%
2009SHEP01	2	19	6.06%
2007HESS01	2	38	5.71%
2008WEST02	2	24	5.56%
2003MAKI01	1	19	5.56%
2005SUSE01	1	12	5.00%
2007XUYU01	1	25	5.00%
2007LUCH01	1	14	5.00%
2007BLAC01	1	12	5.00%
2007CINO01	1	20	5.00%
2007HOHU01	1	10	5.00%
2008ZHUA01	2	40	4.76%
2005HSUA01	1	19	4.76%
2008MIZU01	1	17	4.17%
2008CAOP01	1	15	4.17%
2006DZOA03	2	43	4.05%
2007GUIM01	1	22	4.00%
2007SUNT01	1	23	4.00%
2008COUR01	4	66	3.59%
2007PAPA01	1	17	3.33%
2007ADSU01	1	23	3.33%
2007FUBO01	1	22	3.13%
2003BURT01	3	60	2.86%
2004KRIG01	1	28	2.78%
2006NORS01	1	32	2.22%
2006GARR01	1	38	2.08%
2005BATI01	1	29	1.67%
2004ZAMO01	1	53	1.30%

bf solvers (ranked by success):
success = 3/3 solved per round (no DNF and no DNS) (i.e. successful round)
top 10

Code: 
personId	success	rounds	accuracy
2004GALL02	36	65	50.04%
2007HABE01	14	17	70.83%
2008AURO01	14	44	25.28%
2005KOCZ01	11	33	28.73%
2007HUGH01	10	30	25.11%
2004LOLE01	10	47	19.84%
2006BUUS01	7	33	35.86%
2004MAOT02	7	48	14.87%
2009LIAN03	7	21	24.62%
2004CHAN04	5	61	6.80%

bf solvers (ranked by accuracy):
success = 2/3 solved per round (one DNF or DNS) (i.e. successful round)
excluding competitors with 0%

Code: 
personId	success	rounds	accuracy
2011ALLU01	1	1	100.00%
2010ESTR01	2	2	100.00%
2011PUGH01	1	1	100.00%
2005FERN01	1	1	100.00%
2010MLLE02	1	1	100.00%
2005KOHN01	1	1	100.00%
2011JIAN15	1	1	100.00%
2006DEPE01	1	1	100.00%
2010ADRI01	1	1	100.00%
2006GERH01	1	1	100.00%
2010LESA01	1	1	100.00%
2006JAIW01	1	1	100.00%
2010SUJI02	2	2	100.00%
2007BAUT01	3	3	100.00%
2011DESM01	1	1	100.00%
2007HABE01	17	17	100.00%
2011LESM01	1	1	100.00%
2007KOIK01	1	1	100.00%
2011WIBO01	2	2	100.00%
2007MINH01	1	1	100.00%
2010CHEN62	1	1	100.00%
2007RAMI01	2	2	100.00%
2010HWAN02	1	1	100.00%
2007SEUN02	2	2	100.00%
2010MARK05	1	1	100.00%
2007TING01	1	1	100.00%
2010RAMA10	4	4	100.00%
2008BUMS01	1	1	100.00%
2010YAMA04	1	1	100.00%
2008DELU01	1	1	100.00%
2011CHEC01	2	2	100.00%
2008HARR03	2	2	100.00%
2011GOTT03	1	1	100.00%
2008LIBI01	1	1	100.00%
2011KANA02	1	1	100.00%
2008LIOU01	1	1	100.00%
2011LONG02	1	1	100.00%
2008PEIX01	2	2	100.00%
2011SYAH02	1	1	100.00%
2008PEPK01	1	1	100.00%
2011YAOK01	1	1	100.00%
2008PROK01	2	2	100.00%
2010BADR01	1	1	100.00%
2008SHAN03	1	1	100.00%
2010CHUN04	1	1	100.00%
2008TALA01	1	1	100.00%
2010HARY01	1	1	100.00%
2008WERM01	1	1	100.00%
2010KURN03	1	1	100.00%
2008XUZU01	1	1	100.00%
2010LIUR02	1	1	100.00%
2009AYAL01	1	1	100.00%
2010MARU01	1	1	100.00%
2009BAVE01	1	1	100.00%
2010RADI02	1	1	100.00%
2009BOUL03	1	1	100.00%
2010RICH03	3	3	100.00%
2009CHAO03	1	1	100.00%
2010UCHA01	1	1	100.00%
2009CHUE01	2	2	100.00%
2010ZHAN36	1	1	100.00%
2009DICK01	1	1	100.00%
2011CHAP01	1	1	100.00%
2009FORS01	1	1	100.00%
2011CHOI02	4	4	100.00%
2009HAMO01	1	1	100.00%
2011EFRA01	1	1	100.00%
2009JOHN08	1	1	100.00%
2011HIDA03	1	1	100.00%
2009KOZA01	4	4	100.00%
2011KAHA01	1	1	100.00%
2009LEON06	1	1	100.00%
2011KHOD01	1	1	100.00%
2009MONE01	1	1	100.00%
2011LISI02	1	1	100.00%
2009MONS01	1	1	100.00%
2011PADM01	1	1	100.00%
2011ZAWA01	1	1	100.00%
2011SWAR01	2	2	100.00%
2009SANG02	3	3	100.00%
2011WANG30	1	1	100.00%
2009SHMA01	1	1	100.00%
2011XUZH02	1	1	100.00%
2009SUNM01	1	1	100.00%
2009THEO01	1	1	100.00%
2009NINH01	1	1	100.00%
2007ENDR01	9	10	91.67%
2007STRE01	6	7	90.00%
2008CASI01	4	5	88.89%
2007GOTA01	6	8	86.67%
2004GALL02	57	65	85.15%
2006BONN01	4	6	83.33%
2009BATT02	4	5	83.33%
2009OKAY01	10	12	83.33%
2007STAW01	4	5	83.33%
2006GUZE01	7	10	81.25%
2009LIAN03	15	21	79.55%
2009LEAN01	6	9	75.56%
2005KOCZ01	23	33	75.27%
2010KUSU02	3	5	75.00%
2009ROST01	6	9	75.00%
2006ORLA01	9	12	75.00%
2008PHEL01	3	5	75.00%
2010HARI01	3	4	75.00%
2009AGUS01	3	4	75.00%
2007QIAN01	2	3	75.00%
2010MARI02	2	3	75.00%
2010MICH03	5	7	75.00%
2010SANC04	2	3	75.00%
2011CHAN10	3	4	75.00%
2011ZHUK01	3	4	75.00%
2009OLSS01	2	3	75.00%
2009BJOR01	8	13	74.07%
2008VARG01	13	17	73.57%
2006BUUS01	22	33	72.32%
2010MARK03	5	7	71.43%
2006TABU02	9	14	70.48%
2005HSUA01	14	19	70.48%
2009KUBO01	4	7	70.00%
2003HARD01	10	16	68.75%
2006KIMB01	3	5	66.67%
2009ARAM01	2	3	66.67%
2007DANY01	3	6	66.67%
2009WANG83	2	3	66.67%
2010HONG01	3	5	66.67%
2010RAIH01	2	4	66.67%
2006BYUN01	2	4	66.67%
2008LEED01	2	3	66.67%
2008NGOW01	2	4	66.67%
2005VANH01	2	4	66.67%
2010BACH02	2	5	62.50%
2009ANAM01	7	13	62.50%
2004CHAN01	3	5	62.50%
2004LOLE01	33	47	61.51%
2010HANS01	3	7	60.00%
2006JANG01	3	5	60.00%
2010RANI01	3	5	60.00%
2008SEPP01	10	14	60.00%
2011KOGL01	3	5	60.00%
2008REYE04	2	7	58.33%
2007WAPP01	4	7	58.33%
2005BOUC01	3	5	58.33%
2010LIAN06	2	9	56.25%
2009ADIW01	6	11	55.00%
2006BARL01	4	7	54.17%
2008BERG04	7	13	54.17%
2007BOUR01	7	12	52.67%
2007LUCH02	16	31	51.94%
2007YUAL01	8	15	51.67%
2007HUGH01	19	30	50.89%
2009PETI01	10	15	50.79%
2003MORG01	1	2	50.00%
2011SOAR01	1	2	50.00%
2010SIEM01	1	3	50.00%
2007WEST02	1	2	50.00%
2006SEUN02	1	2	50.00%
2008FURU01	1	6	50.00%
2007LAIR01	1	2	50.00%
2008SEPT01	1	3	50.00%
2007ROKA01	2	3	50.00%
2008SOML01	1	2	50.00%
2010ALFA04	1	2	50.00%
2008TRAN05	1	4	50.00%
2010GODO02	1	2	50.00%
2007BERG01	1	2	50.00%
2010LIAN03	1	6	50.00%
2008VORJ01	2	4	50.00%
2008CALA01	1	2	50.00%
2008WAIC01	1	5	50.00%
2010WIBO01	1	2	50.00%
2008WANG06	1	2	50.00%
2011LARS02	1	2	50.00%
2008ZABO01	1	2	50.00%
2010ADHA01	3	6	50.00%
2009ADIA01	1	2	50.00%
2010ANDE03	3	6	50.00%
2008HAKO01	1	2	50.00%
2010COOK01	1	3	50.00%
2008BERG01	1	2	50.00%
2007STER01	2	3	50.00%
2008JUKK01	1	3	50.00%
2008LIYA02	2	3	50.00%
2004ROUA01	1	2	50.00%
2010LIJI02	1	4	50.00%
2009BEER01	2	6	50.00%
2010PRAJ01	1	2	50.00%
2007CHEN06	1	2	50.00%
2010ROJA01	1	2	50.00%
2009BUNP01	1	4	50.00%
2010SWAR01	3	6	50.00%
2009CAST06	2	3	50.00%
2010WONG01	1	2	50.00%
2009CHAN15	6	12	50.00%
2011HAFI01	1	2	50.00%
2009COLO03	5	10	50.00%
2011SARN01	1	2	50.00%
2009DINI01	1	2	50.00%
2005THON01	1	2	50.00%
2009FLUG01	1	2	50.00%
2010ADHI02	1	2	50.00%
2009HONG04	1	2	50.00%
2010ALWA01	1	2	50.00%
2009HUDI01	2	3	50.00%
2010ARDH01	1	2	50.00%
2009JAMS01	1	2	50.00%
2010BOLL01	1	2	50.00%
2009JIAN03	2	4	50.00%
2010FATH01	1	2	50.00%
2009JOON01	1	2	50.00%
2010GOHI02	1	2	50.00%
2009KOTH01	1	2	50.00%
2010HIDA01	2	4	50.00%
2007CHEN07	1	2	50.00%
2010HUAN01	1	2	50.00%
2009LASS01	4	7	50.00%
2008NERA01	1	2	50.00%
2009LIJI02	1	2	50.00%
2007TAMB01	4	8	50.00%
2009LIUE01	1	2	50.00%
2010MAKA01	1	2	50.00%
2005VALD01	2	4	50.00%
2010NGUY38	1	2	50.00%
2011YUAN05	1	2	50.00%
2008OLLE01	2	5	50.00%
2005WALL01	1	2	50.00%
2010REHA01	2	4	50.00%
2011ZHAN36	1	2	50.00%
2010RUGA01	1	3	50.00%
2011ANGG03	1	2	50.00%
2010SITT01	1	3	50.00%
2011ARDI03	1	2	50.00%
2010WANG68	3	6	50.00%
2011ATRI01	2	4	50.00%
2010WILK01	1	2	50.00%
2011CHEN03	1	2	50.00%
2010YUNI01	1	2	50.00%
2011ERLA01	1	2	50.00%
2011GRIT01	1	2	50.00%
2011ARIF01	1	2	50.00%
2009RYAB01	1	2	50.00%
2011BARA01	1	2	50.00%
2009SHAO05	1	3	50.00%
2011CHOI01	2	4	50.00%
2009SHEE01	2	3	50.00%
2011FAHM01	1	2	50.00%
2011VENK02	1	2	50.00%
2011HABI01	1	2	50.00%
2007MOKR01	1	3	50.00%
2008CHEN10	1	3	50.00%
2009SIKL01	2	3	50.00%
2011OBLA01	1	2	50.00%
2009SMIT03	1	2	50.00%
2011SHAH01	1	2	50.00%
2006OOKU02	1	4	50.00%
2011SUOJ01	1	2	50.00%
2009YAND01	1	2	50.00%
2008CUST01	1	4	50.00%
2009YANG31	3	4	50.00%
2009SIHA01	1	2	50.00%
2009MAUL01	2	4	50.00%
2011YULI01	1	2	50.00%
2009NATE02	1	2	50.00%
2011ZHOU01	1	2	50.00%
2008AURO01	32	44	49.17%
2006TSAO01	10	17	48.89%
2005LUCZ01	5	11	48.33%
2007JIPT01	12	18	47.67%
2008WEST02	12	24	47.06%
2009ARSA01	11	21	46.43%
2004CHAN04	21	61	46.32%
2007LUCH01	8	14	45.83%
2008TAKA01	4	10	45.83%
2007SHIR01	7	16	45.83%
2009THIE02	3	7	45.00%
2003POCH01	5	11	45.00%
2008BARA01	18	29	44.85%
2007SUNT01	7	23	44.67%
2008HASH02	2	6	44.44%
2007LIBI01	4	9	44.44%
2005PEER01	2	5	44.44%
2010BENT01	8	15	44.44%
2006JORG01	2	5	44.44%
2007WATA02	2	5	44.44%
2008HINL01	3	6	44.44%
2007KORZ01	4	11	43.33%
2007YUNQ01	14	19	43.18%
2004MAOT02	22	48	43.13%
2009OLSO01	3	10	42.86%
2009LOOS01	4	9	42.50%
2007ADSU01	10	23	42.00%
2007LIME01	7	21	41.90%
2003WINO01	3	8	41.67%
2004FONN01	2	7	41.67%
2009WANG43	2	9	41.67%
2009QIAO03	4	7	41.67%
2009ROCH01	4	7	41.67%
2008PUTH01	3	8	41.67%
2009FEAN01	4	9	41.67%
2010YUGI02	2	5	41.67%
2009MYSH01	3	7	41.67%
2005AKKE01	15	47	41.13%
2008ZHAN13	7	12	40.48%
2005ZOLN01	7	28	40.28%
2010BENI02	2	5	40.00%
2011TRON02	2	5	40.00%
2011MANS02	2	5	40.00%
2009YANG06	2	5	40.00%
2009KOUR01	2	5	40.00%
2010CARN01	7	15	40.00%
2005ANGO01	3	10	40.00%
2009PLIT01	2	5	40.00%
2008TURN02	4	11	39.29%
2009ZHAN31	3	6	38.89%
2005REYN01	16	46	38.70%
2009XUAN03	5	15	38.41%
2006CORR01	3	11	38.33%
2007COMP01	7	17	38.33%
2010WIDO01	2	6	37.50%
2011ZALE02	3	8	37.50%
2005LEVI01	3	7	37.50%
2010DONA01	3	8	37.50%
2008LEEF01	2	9	37.50%
2010GIRO01	3	5	37.50%
2009GIOR01	3	6	37.50%
2008MORE02	4	12	37.50%
2007BLAC01	3	12	35.00%
2007LUND01	7	22	34.67%
2009DIEC01	6	17	34.29%
2005BATI01	10	29	33.89%
2008LAUR01	7	17	33.33%
2011AQUI01	1	3	33.33%
2008JIAO01	2	6	33.33%
2007FEHE01	2	4	33.33%
2009WANG62	5	7	33.33%
2011WICA01	1	3	33.33%
2008CHUC02	3	7	33.33%
2011HUAN10	1	3	33.33%
2009KLIN01	1	3	33.33%
2011PUME01	1	3	33.33%
2009YAUR01	1	3	33.33%
2010SOUZ01	1	3	33.33%
2008DONG06	4	13	33.33%
2007LIUH01	1	3	33.33%
2008LIMP01	2	5	33.33%
2009TIRA01	4	12	33.33%
2006WANG04	1	7	33.33%
2011KERN02	1	3	33.33%
2010BELO01	1	3	33.33%
2011NATU01	1	3	33.33%
2009CHEN45	1	3	33.33%
2011SERV03	1	3	33.33%
2008CHEN13	1	3	33.33%
2010SMIR01	2	5	33.33%
2010BOON01	2	5	33.33%
2010TIAN03	1	3	33.33%
2008LAMH01	2	5	33.33%
2008COOK01	1	3	33.33%
2010WUIF01	1	3	33.33%
2010CHOR01	1	3	33.33%
2010ZHAO11	1	3	33.33%
2011ENGB02	1	3	33.33%
2008RODR01	1	6	33.33%
2008ROST01	1	5	33.33%
2011GRZY01	1	3	33.33%
2008VELA01	2	4	33.33%
2007LUJI01	3	7	33.33%
2011HORI01	2	6	33.33%
2008ABAN01	1	4	33.33%
2009OLIV04	1	3	33.33%
2010GUOX01	1	3	33.33%
2011KOWA01	1	3	33.33%
2010KARY02	2	4	33.33%
2011MOLL01	1	3	33.33%
2010LENG01	2	4	33.33%
2011NUGR02	1	3	33.33%
2006BIEN01	1	4	33.33%
2011SAKO01	2	6	33.33%
2010OMUL02	1	3	33.33%
2011SULI01	1	3	33.33%
2009GUOS01	1	3	33.33%
2006BITE01	2	5	33.33%
2007DAEP01	1	3	33.33%
2009NOVI02	1	4	33.33%
2009LUOX01	1	4	33.33%
2006GARR01	12	38	33.19%
2008GUOJ01	3	9	32.50%
2009SHIN02	6	13	32.14%
2008CAOP01	7	15	31.94%
2005GREE02	4	13	31.67%
2008LINT01	4	12	31.67%
2008POTR01	5	15	31.25%
2005KOZK01	3	15	31.25%
2003MAKI01	5	19	31.11%
2008ZHUA01	14	40	30.79%
2007PAPA01	6	17	30.00%
2004NOOR01	3	15	30.00%
2007HOHU01	3	10	30.00%
2009YINM01	2	7	29.17%
2008NIEL01	4	13	28.75%
2006YOUN03	8	24	28.57%
2005BAUM01	6	18	28.33%
2007HESS01	12	38	28.15%
2008CIRN01	12	29	27.78%
2004ROUX01	2	7	27.78%
2006WONG01	3	11	27.78%
2009CRUZ04	2	6	27.78%
2007DUSS01	6	22	26.34%
2007XUYU01	7	25	26.03%
2008SKAR01	4	15	25.40%
2007LOPE01	4	9	25.00%
2010HONG12	1	3	25.00%
2011CASA01	1	4	25.00%
2006MERT01	1	3	25.00%
2008HANG01	1	6	25.00%
2010BHAV01	1	3	25.00%
2007AGUA01	3	11	25.00%
2010HERR02	1	3	25.00%
2009GORY01	1	4	25.00%
2009GIOS01	1	4	25.00%
2009PUTR07	1	3	25.00%
2006SHEN01	1	3	25.00%
2010MUHA02	2	5	25.00%
2009SIUN01	1	3	25.00%
2008BLOH02	1	4	25.00%
2010AZAR01	1	3	25.00%
2010PAUL02	3	9	25.00%
2009MAGN02	1	4	25.00%
2010PERE01	2	5	25.00%
2007AKUT01	1	3	25.00%
2010PULC01	1	4	25.00%
2010GRAN02	2	5	25.00%
2011TUBR01	1	4	25.00%
2008DENI01	1	3	25.00%
2007LISI02	2	6	25.00%
2009POOK01	1	4	25.00%
2008MCKN01	1	3	25.00%
2008SOUL01	2	7	25.00%
2009XUEL01	1	4	25.00%
2011JOVI01	1	4	25.00%
2008VENK01	1	3	25.00%
2010HAND01	1	3	25.00%
2011ROHM01	1	4	25.00%
2009BEVA01	1	4	25.00%
2010GEIG01	1	3	25.00%
2007FARE01	1	4	25.00%
2010WIJA03	1	3	25.00%
2009CHAT03	1	3	25.00%
2007YUGU01	1	4	25.00%
2008KAPI01	1	6	25.00%
2009LLAN01	2	7	25.00%
2009YICH01	1	3	25.00%
2003KNIG01	1	4	25.00%
2009CASA01	1	4	25.00%
2006BURN01	1	10	25.00%
2008ZHUJ01	1	4	25.00%
2008MAND01	1	4	25.00%
2009HORM02	1	4	25.00%
2008LEME01	4	12	24.44%
2007CINO01	7	20	24.29%
2007PERG01	2	18	24.00%
2009SHEP01	7	19	23.74%
2008LINE01	4	17	23.33%
2010CULL01	2	11	22.92%
2008SMIT01	6	20	22.86%
2008TROM01	2	9	22.50%
2007FIDE01	5	17	21.96%
2006ROBA01	6	22	21.43%
2007GUIM01	6	22	21.17%
2006JOHA01	2	8	20.83%
2009ELIN01	3	14	20.37%
2007GOUL01	5	35	20.26%
2009DENG01	2	7	20.00%
2008ORTE02	2	6	20.00%
2006EIDE01	2	7	20.00%
2005CHEN02	1	6	20.00%
2003AKIM01	1	8	20.00%
2011FAUZ02	1	5	20.00%
2007DJIA01	2	10	20.00%
2009SWEE01	2	7	20.00%
2009SULE01	3	11	19.44%
2007FUBO01	5	22	19.38%
2008COUR01	20	66	18.91%
2007ORTR01	2	9	18.75%
2004KRIG02	4	20	18.75%
2006DZOA03	6	43	18.65%
2008KEAR01	3	11	18.33%
2005KWON01	3	17	18.33%
2003BURT01	17	60	18.06%
2007ALEX01	3	12	17.86%
2009CHRI03	3	18	17.50%
2007POIN01	1	5	16.67%
2011RIGG03	1	6	16.67%
2010WANG07	2	7	16.67%
2010DAVI06	1	6	16.67%
2007SAHA01	1	4	16.67%
2006LECK01	1	6	16.67%
2010ESPI01	1	5	16.67%
2008SHAN01	1	4	16.67%
2009CUIH01	1	4	16.67%
2008KAOC01	1	4	16.67%
2010ADHI01	2	7	16.67%
2008SMIT04	2	13	16.67%
2009BAKK01	1	6	16.67%
2008SOLD01	1	5	16.67%
2006DZOA02	1	7	16.67%
2009BALT02	1	8	16.67%
2010MAHE02	1	4	16.67%
2009FAIS01	2	8	16.67%
2010MANC01	1	4	16.67%
2008HALL02	1	4	16.67%
2009FEIF01	1	4	16.67%
2008WONE01	2	12	16.67%
2010ZAKI01	1	6	16.67%
2007NAKA03	1	4	16.67%
2003MORR01	1	4	16.67%
2008BALL02	1	6	16.67%
2009XIAT02	1	5	16.67%
2008HEJJ01	1	4	16.67%
2006MIYA01	1	4	16.67%
2010CHAN14	1	4	16.67%
2007CHAN06	1	9	16.67%
2010CHOK01	1	5	16.67%
2007LICH01	1	4	16.67%
2008XIAN01	1	5	16.67%
2009MOSK01	1	4	16.67%
2008YOUN02	2	16	16.67%
2010KOHL02	1	5	16.67%
2005VALD02	1	5	16.67%
2009BARB01	1	5	16.67%
2010ESTU01	2	8	16.67%
2008MAPE01	2	9	16.67%
2009TEEP01	1	5	16.67%
2008BONO01	3	19	15.63%
2004KRIG01	5	28	15.28%
2009DIMP01	2	14	14.29%
2006KRUE01	4	21	14.00%
2005WOIT01	2	13	14.00%
2006GALE01	8	44	13.83%
2009CONT01	2	15	13.39%
2006ARAK01	4	24	13.33%
2009LOHU01	2	13	13.33%
2008WUKU01	2	14	13.33%
2008OMYO01	2	9	13.33%
2007BODO01	2	12	13.33%
2007MOSE02	3	13	13.33%
2009ZHAO05	1	6	12.50%
2007BRIT01	1	5	12.50%
2010GONZ03	1	6	12.50%
2010SEID01	1	9	12.50%
2007ESTE01	1	5	12.50%
2008LOPE03	1	5	12.50%
2008MHLS01	1	8	12.50%
2006MOND01	1	10	12.50%
2010HUYN01	1	5	12.50%
2007ZHON01	1	6	12.50%
2010WANS01	1	6	12.50%
2007SHUF01	1	6	12.50%
2007WEIW01	1	5	12.50%
2004CHAM01	3	11	12.50%
2009KASE02	1	5	12.50%
2004ZAMO01	7	53	12.12%
2005SUSE01	2	12	11.67%
2008ZIMM01	3	17	11.54%
2007JAME01	2	21	11.46%
2007ZHAN03	2	12	11.25%
2008TAIC01	1	7	11.11%
2007OMUR01	1	6	11.11%
2008WRIG02	1	7	11.11%
2007CHAT01	1	5	11.11%
2008ALPI01	1	5	11.11%
2008DHAN01	1	6	11.11%
2007WEIN01	2	12	11.11%
2008SANT01	2	9	11.11%
2008DARG01	1	6	11.11%
2008MIZU01	2	17	10.83%
2006TABU01	3	16	10.71%
2004PONS01	1	7	10.00%
2008SAJI01	1	6	10.00%
2009THIE03	1	7	10.00%
2010KAPK01	1	7	10.00%
2007CHAN07	2	8	10.00%
2010LICH02	1	6	10.00%
2005SIMO01	1	11	10.00%
2007LENO01	3	11	10.00%
2008WITG01	1	7	10.00%
2009KONI03	1	7	10.00%
2005LODA01	3	16	9.71%
2009SEVE01	2	21	9.70%
2007POLI01	4	24	9.55%
2009ZEMD01	2	17	8.47%
2008BRAN01	3	25	8.46%
2008HACK01	1	10	8.33%
2006MOIT01	1	7	8.33%
2008MERL01	1	7	8.33%
2008CONG01	1	7	8.33%
2009WANG21	1	7	8.33%
2010BREC01	1	12	8.33%
2007THOM02	1	6	8.33%
2006WRIG01	1	6	8.33%
2008PAWL03	1	7	8.33%
2008BUCS01	1	11	8.33%
2009CADM01	1	8	8.33%
2009CHEN50	1	6	8.33%
2007JAKU01	1	20	8.33%
2008ASIS01	1	6	8.33%
2006CUDZ01	1	7	8.33%
2006NORS01	3	32	7.78%
2008SEAR01	2	22	7.29%
2010DESJ01	1	10	7.14%
2007LEMO01	2	26	6.94%
2009SAEZ01	1	8	6.67%
2008YANG09	1	9	6.67%
2007NELS02	1	10	6.67%
2006ARAK02	1	10	6.67%
2008MONT04	1	12	6.67%
2005KOSE01	1	9	6.25%
2006FRAN01	1	9	6.25%
2009BRUS01	2	27	5.16%
2009LEVR01	1	12	5.00%
2009NEIT01	1	20	5.00%
2008DIEW01	1	15	5.00%
2007PERD01	1	19	5.00%
2008KLUN01	1	12	4.17%
2008ERBI01	1	16	3.57%
2003DENN01	1	27	2.86%
2007COHE01	1	39	2.00%

bf solvers (ranked by success):
success = 2/3 solved per round (one DNF or DNS) (i.e. successful round)
top 20

Code: 
personId	success	rounds	accuracy
2004GALL02	57	65	85.15%
2004LOLE01	33	47	61.51%
2008AURO01	32	44	49.17%
2005KOCZ01	23	33	75.27%
2004MAOT02	22	48	43.13%
2006BUUS01	22	33	72.32%
2004CHAN04	21	61	46.32%
2008COUR01	20	66	18.91%
2007HUGH01	19	30	50.89%
2008BARA01	18	29	44.85%
2003BURT01	17	60	18.06%
2007HABE01	17	17	100.00%
2007LUCH02	16	31	51.94%
2005REYN01	16	46	38.70%
2005AKKE01	15	47	41.13%
2009LIAN03	15	21	79.55%
2005HSUA01	14	19	70.48%
2007YUNQ01	14	19	43.18%
2008ZHUA01	14	40	30.79%
2008VARG01	13	17	73.57%

SQL for anyone who cares:
Code: 
use test;

SELECT
    r.personId,
    r.year,
    success,
    rounds
FROM
(
    SELECT
        personId,
        year,
        COUNT(*) as rounds
    FROM
        results INNER JOIN competitions ON results.competitionId = competitions.id
    WHERE
        eventId = '333bf'
    AND
        formatId = '3'
    GROUP BY
        personId,
        year
) AS r LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
    SELECT
        personId,
        year,
        COUNT(*) as success
    FROM
        results INNER JOIN competitions ON results.competitionId = competitions.id
    WHERE
        eventId = '333bf'
    AND
        formatId = '3'
    AND
        value1 > 0
    AND
        value2 > 0
    AND
        value3 > 0
    GROUP BY
        personId,
        year
) as s ON r.personId = s.personId AND r.year = s.year
GROUP BY
    personId,
    year
ORDER BY
    personId ASC,
    year DESC LIMIT 10000;

EDIT: Just to clarify: the 2/3 split is combined with 3/3.

bf solvers for 2011 (ranked by accuracy):
success = 3/3 solved per round (no DNF and no DNS) (i.e. successful round)
excluding those < 50% accuracy

Code: 
personId	success	rounds	accuracy
2007HABE01	8	8	100.00%
2010MLLE02	1	1	100.00%
2010HWAN02	1	1	100.00%
2011KANA02	1	1	100.00%
2007GOTA01	1	1	100.00%
2010LIUR02	1	1	100.00%
2010SANC04	1	1	100.00%
2009BOUL03	1	1	100.00%
2011LONG02	1	1	100.00%
2011ZAWA01	1	1	100.00%
2011XUZH02	1	1	100.00%
2007HUGH01	6	9	66.67%
2010RAMA10	2	3	66.67%
2007ENDR01	3	5	60.00%
2004GALL02	11	22	50.00%
2007JIPT01	3	6	50.00%
2009PETI01	3	6	50.00%
2008BERG04	2	4	50.00%
2008TAKA01	2	4	50.00%
2011CHOI02	2	4	50.00%
2010AZAR01	1	2	50.00%
2011CHEC01	1	2	50.00%
2009PUTR07	1	2	50.00%
2011YULI01	1	2	50.00%
2011ZHAN36	1	2	50.00%
2010SWAR01	1	2	50.00%
2008VENK01	1	2	50.00%
2011ARDI03	1	2	50.00%
2009KUBO01	1	2	50.00%
2011OBLA01	1	2	50.00%
2009POOK01	1	2	50.00%
2010ADHI02	1	2	50.00%

Tim.
 
Last edited:
Suggestion:

Possible formats for blindfolded events: Best of 3, Mean of 3
Preferred format for final rounds: Best of 3

Rankings don't change, people can choose to carry on with current DNFy styles, but there is also a mean result recorded. Benefits are that this is backwards compatible. Drawbacks are that it requires people to not consider a number on a list to be vitally important (see 2x2 single debate).
 
keyan said:
Suggestion:

Possible formats for blindfolded events: Best of 3, Mean of 3
Preferred format for final rounds: Best of 3
Click to expand...

If it's best of 3 and someone gets all three, should they still get a mean in the database (i.e. only round ranking is determined by format)?
If so, what would be done with past rounds with 3 solves? (Fewer solves?)
 
Lucas Garron said:
If it's best of 3 and someone gets all three, should they still get a mean in the database (i.e. only round ranking is determined by format)?
If so, what would be done with past rounds with 3 solves? (Fewer solves?)
Click to expand...
My wording was bad. I'm saying that rounds of best of 3 should have an average calculated, but that rankings can still be based off of best single. So that nothing we do now changes except that a new score is created. The "winner" of a round as shown on the WCA page is the same. Past competitions with three solves can have an average calculated, but rankings would be unchanged. Competitions with fewer solves would be unaffected.
 
the harder sequence : the best 3 of 5 attempt,then average the 3 attempts < 5 attempt , get rid of the best one and the worst one ,average 3 < mean of 3
at least success/attemp: 3/5 4/5 3/3
the success rate is y : 6*y^5-15*y^4+10*y^3 5*y^4-4*y^5 y^3
if success rate is 90%: 99.14% 91.85% 72.9%
if success rate is 80%: 94.21% 73.73% 51.2%
if success rate is 60%: 68.26% 33.70% 21.6%
if success rate is 40%: 31.74% 8.7% 6.4%
if success rate is 25%: 10.35% 1.5625% 1.5625%
if success rate is 20%: 5.79% 0.67% 0.8%
if success rate is 10%: 0.86% 0.046% 0.1%
 
Seeing the event success rates in Tim's stats post, and in relation to roundy's post above, here are some other BLD stats.

Overall success rate for all competitors that have at least one success: 8390 / 24815 = 0.33810195446303
Competitors without any successes are disregarded on the possibility that they can't actually solve. (the Buck rule)

2011 overall success rate for all competitors that have at least one success: 2873 / 7805 = 0.36809737347854

And looking at top competitors, success rate of all solves from rounds containing solves in the top 100 solves: 133 / 221 = 0.601810

With roundy's numbers above, top competitors would only be getting a third of averages of 5. Overall, only single digit percentages would have successful averages. That would be a pretty ugly change. Any thoughts on my previous suggestion? (Make an average score, but continue to give competition rankings based off of single.)

Thanks to Baiqiang for the stats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
[WCA Regulations 2012] Clarification about stopping the timer
2
Replies
22
Views
6,163
Dene
Dene
O
[WCA Regulations 2012] Scramble Reordering
Replies
18
Views
5,533
TimMc
TimMc
Erik
[WCA Regulations 2012] Proposal use of stackmat-mat in feet and in general
Replies
9
Views
4,130
tx789
tx789
Lucas Garron
[WCA Regulations 2012] Clock Notation
2
Replies
32
Views
8,162
Pedro
P
A
[WCA Regulations 2012] Remove +2 penalty for misaligned sides
19 20 21
Replies
405
Views
69,761
gogozerg
G
Back
Top