Order of memo/exc in multiBLD

KConny

Veteran
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
472
Location
Sweden
WCA ID
2007LUND01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Hi guys.

I memo from left to right but solve from right to left. That means that the first cube I memo is the last one I solve.

In what order do you solve your cubes for multiBLD?
 
I do as you do, KConny; the first cube I memo is the last one I solve. I really don't know that it makes much difference one way or the other, though. I've often thought about switching, but I never have. Anyway, this way works.

Interesting that Alex goes the other way. Obviously, that works too!
 
I memorise and solve the same order...

that way, I have to keep each cube for about the same time in my memory
if I did memo one way, solving the other, I'd have to remember the first cube for a lot of time :)

Well, I always review the entire set of cubes before I start to solve. Which means that if I went in your order, I'd still have to remember the last cube for almost as long as I currently have to remember the first cube. Not quite as long, but almost. (It probably only takes 5 minutes or so to review 13 cubes the last time.) So there's not much difference.

Also, an advantage to opposite order is that with that approach you can do the last cube with your normal, non-multi approach. I do that with relays - I do the 2x2x2 cube memorizing at the end and solving at the beginning, just doing a regular 2x2x2 BLD solve on it. But I will admit I don't do that with 3x3x3 BLD multis. Unless I'm just doing 2 or 3 of them, in which case I do (cuts a good 5 or 6 minutes off that last cube time).
 
I do as you do, KConny; the first cube I memo is the last one I solve. I really don't know that it makes much difference one way or the other, though. I've often thought about switching, but I never have. Anyway, this way works.

Interesting that Alex goes the other way. Obviously, that works too!

Umm, don't you use a journey Mike? Do you do your journey backward? :P
 
he uses roman rooms, as far as I remember

which is the same as a journey, just with unnecessary restrictions.

That is actually entirely accurate. :) But I find those unnecessary restrictions helpful, however silly that might be. Somehow, it's just easier to shuffle them around that way, for inexplicable reasons.

It does mean that on multiBLDs, I tend to waste a lot of locations. But that doesn't seem to matter all that much, as it turns out.
 
I've been trying to get a my first 4/4 for a while now, and this week has just been crazy.
Monday: 3/4 18:xx 2 flipped edges
Tuesday: 3/4 16:xx 2flipped edges and 3/4 14:30 two misoriented edges
Wednesday: 3/4 13:13 3 mispermuted edges.
This last attepemt was with a normal solving/memo order, solve first memoed cube first. I liked it more doing it this way since all of the cubes had to be memoed just as well. When i do reverse order I have to memo the first cubes very well and the last one is just like a normal solve. So I think I'm gonna stick with this method. I have to get it right tomorrow, another 3/4 and I'll be so ****ed.
 
What are these restrictions you speak of?

You restrict yourself to a room and (usually) to a specific number (and position) of locations within this room.
Some rooms are much more detailed than others and it feels unnatural to leave out the table in the middle of the room just to follow your conventions.

With journeys you have much more freedom. If a location isn't that great, just leave it out and take the next location which pops into your mind. If you always take the locations which feel right, it's a piece of cake to create and remember your journeys.

KConny: argh, bad luck :/. I wish you luck for your next attempt :)
 
Last edited:
It seems more natural for me to do the last memorized cube first, then continue with the first the cube in the order you memorized. Memo the last cube with speed, and the others with accuracy and encoding.
 
Back
Top