Question about V-cube 2 design

Zarxrax

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
1,282
Location
North Carolina
This has nothing to do with the issues between verdes and guhong, so lets please not bring that into this thread.

Looking through the V-cube patent designs, I noticed that the 2x2x2 design doesn't look particularly exceptional. In fact it looks like pretty much every other 2x2x2 that I have ever seen. I'm wondering what quality particularly sets v-cube's 2x2x2 apart from a normal one?
Has anyone ever made their own V2? Designs at least?
 
Well, actually it does need to be different. If verdes is claiming that his patent covers the 2x2x2, then his design must have some feature that others dont, as you cant patent existing ideas.
 
This is typically where people would ask for a citation, uberCuber, especially since I found this:

http://www.twistypuzzles.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2746

Unfortunately the link doesn't work to the patent, but as you can see, that was posted in 2004.


Ah, I see. That topic is about the patent in Greece, and I was looking at the patent in the USA (since I live in the USA, it was just instinct to look at that one..)
I feel pretty retarded now
 
Last edited:
Eastsheen was granted a US patent for their 2x2x2 in 1998: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5826871.html

It seems to have similar "conic" structure as a v-cube. At least somewhat.
In any case, does this mean that cubes such as lanlan and ghosthand are violating eastsheen's patent?

I don't have an eastsheen, but from what i hear the lanlan is a knockoff of it. i think the ghosthand is slightly different however
 
Back
Top