guzman - that table is, in my opinion, horrible for beginners. Beginners can barely read off algs and perform them correctly as it is, let alone trying to decypher the notation first. Just write the algs as the are, and group together similar moves. Also, i think your pictures/naming and alg choice is poor.
Well, first of all, thanks, your comment helps me.
I actually first made the table for me
and this is how I learnt all the Oll's.
And the Oll's are the first thing I learnt.
My idea was that memorizing lots of algs may become difficult if the algs are just a bunch of random letters.
So I decided to look for patterns and I found out that almost all the oll's are just obtained but mixing
some very basic four letter commutators. This fact becomes very visible if you use a compact notation
for basic commutators (such as [r,u] or simply [ru]) and if you write algs in matrix form:
for instance, I find way more easy to memorize
R
U2
R' - [R'F]
U2 - [R'F]
with its structure that clearly shows the mixture of two commutators (namely [R U2] and [R'F]), than
RU2R2FRF'U2R'FRF'
But I understand that writing things in matrix form and with compact notations creates an obstacle.
For what concerns names I think that the name should describe not only the image of the yellow stikers on the U face,
but also, if possible, the position of the yellow stickers not in the U face.
I find more clear the names C1 and CBar than case 34 and case 46.
Finally, when I said beginners I didn't mean total beginners
but of course the algs are not optimized.
Anyway, I understand what you say and my table is just an experiment.
