ChrisBird
Premium Member
Hey Everyone,
I know this forum is for cubing stuff, but a bunch of you probably have a good amount of experience with buying cars (not everyone on these forums are 20 years old or less) and I have a choice to make.
Assume for the moment that the following two cars are identical in every way except what I will be listing, I'd like to know what you think and why. (Please only comment if you have experience with buying cars).
Mini Cooper #1
From 2002
Good Condition
80,000 Miles
$11,000 list, and could probably convince the seller to bring it down to around 9,000
Mini Cooper #2
From 2006
Good Condition
30,000 Miles
$14,000, and could probably convince him to bring it down to $12,000 or less.
Which would you choose and why.
Here are my thoughts:
Mini #1:
It's older, much older, which isn't a positive. It is getting on it's life (with 80,000 miles) and is getting to that age where it will start needing maintenance (which could be costly). For being 8 years old it is in very good condition, and relatively few miles on it. It is much cheaper, as you can imagine, because of what I have listed.
Mini #2:
It's newer, and only 30,000 miles on it so it will be running for quite a bit longer before it needs maintenance, but it is more expensive, by 3K.
So in your opinion is it worth it to save 3K to get one that is still in great condition, but is older with more miles? Or is it worth it to spend the extra 3K and get a newer one with fewer miles?
As I said before, we should assume they are the same in every other way (as they pretty much are).
I'd love to know your opinion.
~Chris
EDIT: I should also mention the following. I will be paying for this completely up front, with my own money, so no loans or anything on it. Just in case that changes things.
I know this forum is for cubing stuff, but a bunch of you probably have a good amount of experience with buying cars (not everyone on these forums are 20 years old or less) and I have a choice to make.
Assume for the moment that the following two cars are identical in every way except what I will be listing, I'd like to know what you think and why. (Please only comment if you have experience with buying cars).
Mini Cooper #1
From 2002
Good Condition
80,000 Miles
$11,000 list, and could probably convince the seller to bring it down to around 9,000
Mini Cooper #2
From 2006
Good Condition
30,000 Miles
$14,000, and could probably convince him to bring it down to $12,000 or less.
Which would you choose and why.
Here are my thoughts:
Mini #1:
It's older, much older, which isn't a positive. It is getting on it's life (with 80,000 miles) and is getting to that age where it will start needing maintenance (which could be costly). For being 8 years old it is in very good condition, and relatively few miles on it. It is much cheaper, as you can imagine, because of what I have listed.
Mini #2:
It's newer, and only 30,000 miles on it so it will be running for quite a bit longer before it needs maintenance, but it is more expensive, by 3K.
So in your opinion is it worth it to save 3K to get one that is still in great condition, but is older with more miles? Or is it worth it to spend the extra 3K and get a newer one with fewer miles?
As I said before, we should assume they are the same in every other way (as they pretty much are).
I'd love to know your opinion.
~Chris
EDIT: I should also mention the following. I will be paying for this completely up front, with my own money, so no loans or anything on it. Just in case that changes things.
Last edited: