Toronto results

[VooX]

Wow, 17/18!!!!!! Why did he do so many, he only need to do +10 for WR.

Wait? Isn't 18 including in +10?? Unless I'm mistaken it is

The way I understand it, a BLD cuber has to declare how many cubes they will solve and then solve that many cubes. Any unsolved cubes and the competitor gets a DNF.

Way to go Momonga... even though you missed one cube, you did an amazing thing by solving 17.

 

[joey]

Wow, 17/18!!!!!! Why did he do so many, he only need to do +10 for WR.

Wait? Isn't 18 including in +10?? Unless I'm mistaken it is

The way I understand it, a BLD cuber has to declare how many cubes they will solve and then solve that many cubes. Any unsolved cubes and the competitor gets a DNF.

Way to go Momonga... even though you missed one cube, you did an amazing thing by solving 17.

Then you understand wrong. In the database it goes down as 17/18, not as a DNF. Momonga could still win with 17/18... I just can't remember right now wether 17/18 or 2/2(for example) wins..

 

[alexc]

Wow, 17/18!!!!!! Why did he do so many, he only need to do +10 for WR.

Wait? Isn't 18 including in +10?? Unless I'm mistaken it is

Yes it is, but I'm wondering why he didn't just do 12, 13, or maybe 11 instead of jumping way up to 18?

 

[alexc]

Wow, 17/18!!!!!! Why did he do so many, he only need to do +10 for WR.

Wait? Isn't 18 including in +10?? Unless I'm mistaken it is

The way I understand it, a BLD cuber has to declare how many cubes they will solve and then solve that many cubes. Any unsolved cubes and the competitor gets a DNF.

Way to go Momonga... even though you missed one cube, you did an amazing thing by solving 17.

Then you understand wrong. In the database it goes down as 17/18, not as a DNF. Momonga could still win with 17/18... I just can't remember right now wether 17/18 or 2/2(for example) wins..

Sorry for the double post. I think the 2/2 wins. Also, I was looking at the multibld rankings and Tim was ahead of Momonga, even though Tim got 12/16 and Momonga 11/12. Didn't momonga complete a higher percentage of the total cubes, so shouldn't he be ahead of Tim? Or is Tim ahead because his attempt was faster?:confused:

 

[joey]

Wow, 17/18!!!!!! Why did he do so many, he only need to do +10 for WR.

Wait? Isn't 18 including in +10?? Unless I'm mistaken it is

Yes it is, but I'm wondering why he didn't just do 12, 13, or maybe 11 instead of jumping way up to 18?

If he only did (11-13), it would have been easy to beat! If he got 18 right, it would have been alot harder to beat!

 

[alexc]

Wow, 17/18!!!!!! Why did he do so many, he only need to do +10 for WR.

Wait? Isn't 18 including in +10?? Unless I'm mistaken it is

Yes it is, but I'm wondering why he didn't just do 12, 13, or maybe 11 instead of jumping way up to 18?

If he only did (11-13), it would have been easy to beat! If he got 18 right, it would have been alot harder to beat!

True. And does anyone know his memo method? I think his execution method is M2/R2 though I may be wrong.

 

[Stefan]

We display unsuccessful multibld attempts as solved/attempted instead of DNF, because... well... because we can. And because it's interesting, and this way DNFs can still be compared. For single 3x3, there are so many ways to DNF that we can't easily describe/compare how much was solved.

And I believe the priorities are:
1. Success (yes better than no).
2. Number of solved cubes (more are better).
3. Number of attempted cubes (fewer are better).
4. Time (less is better).

 

[DennisStrehlau]

welll...
when you do not do 100% of the cubes, then the number of cubes is what counts, means that:
12 is more than 11, so 12/16 is better than 11/12...
well i also do not understand that?!
on the danish open, there will be a new WR in multi...
Bad to hear, that Derrick didnt do it

Greetings...Dennis...

 

[joey]

Wow, 17/18!!!!!! Why did he do so many, he only need to do +10 for WR.

Wait? Isn't 18 including in +10?? Unless I'm mistaken it is

Yes it is, but I'm wondering why he didn't just do 12, 13, or maybe 11 instead of jumping way up to 18?

If he only did (11-13), it would have been easy to beat! If he got 18 right, it would have been alot harder to beat!

True. And does anyone know his memo method? I think his execution method is M2/R2 though I may be wrong.

He uses images. Letter pairs, like chris and daniel.

 

[Jack]

Ryosuke attempted 18 cubes twice (the second time I think was 14/18). He ended up third behind 3/3 and 2/2! Rowe also attempted twelve, but I don't know how many he got.

 

[tim]

Wow, 17/18!!!!!! Why did he do so many, he only need to do +10 for WR.

Wait? Isn't 18 including in +10?? Unless I'm mistaken it is

Yes it is, but I'm wondering why he didn't just do 12, 13, or maybe 11 instead of jumping way up to 18?

If he only did (11-13), it would have been easy to beat! If he got 18 right, it would have been alot harder to beat!

True. And does anyone know his memo method? I think his execution method is M2/R2 though I may be wrong.

It's quite obvious, which memo method he uses, isn't it?

btw. Wasn't there a time limit for multi bld? He made two attempts, each of them took him more than 2 hours o_O.

And what about the "new rule" (one hour time limit for the whole attempt, counting the solved cubes)? We wouldn't have such close attempts anymore (I feel sorry for Momonga).

 

[Pedro]

Rowe got 9/12

9f16) For the 3x3x3 Cube: Multiple Blindfolded event the order in the results is based on:
Highest in the ranking are the competitors who solved all puzzles, among these competitors a larger number means better. For equal results the lower total time means better.
Next in the ranking are the competitors who solved at least one of the puzzles, among these competitors a larger number of solved puzzles means better, and after this a lower number of attempted puzzles means better. For equal results the lower total time means better.
Next in the ranking are the competitors who did not solve at least one puzzle, these competitors all finish at the worst position.

Stefan is right

 

[Stefan]

F***. I did search for "multi" in the rules but missed that part. Hmpf, I could've said "Isn't anyone capable of reading the rules?" like I wanted to.

 

[Harris Chan]

There should be a change in the rule..

 

[pjk]

Nice results. Rowe did the 3rd best 3x3 BLD solve yet, as well as the 2nd best OH solve in the world. Mondo, congrats on 17/18.

Good work guys.

 

[KConny]

There should be a change in the rule..

No. You don't count number of solved cubies in normal BLD.

 

[Harris Chan]

There should be a change in the rule..

No. You don't count number of solved cubies in normal BLD.

So? You're saying that a person who is only attempting to solve an F2L and gets it is better than someone who tries to do the whole cube but only manages up to PLL?

Ok my example was bad xD

Joel suggested that they should count the number of cubes solved, and but only the 100% gets the WR. So 17/18 is better than 12/12, but 12/12 is the WR. (I quoted almost word for word )

 

[philkt731]

whats the point of that?
You can't be "better" than the person with the world record and not have it yourself...

 

[Derrick Eide17]

Thanks Dennis

I was very upset with My MultiBLD because i did so Horrible.....

Mondo deserves HUGE respect though, he is a great guy, and a GREAT, hard working cuber, and someday he WILL get the World record and i hope he does soon, because he will be very happy and he deserves to get it! Great job with 17 still! Im glad I had a chance to meet him in person too! and Especially Rowe hessler, he is such a great guy, and the best BLD cuber out there in my opinion.

 

[AvGalen]

If you can do 17/18, handle the disappointment, decide to try again (and get 14/18) you are a hero!