the last supper

[Innocence]

Yes. There is plenty of evidence that there is a sentinent being, probably the Judeo-Christian God. Of course, the majority of evolutionists fail to recongnize this evidence, because they're "right". Not really. Apparently it's not scientific as it's illogical(miracles, etc.). What we need to realize is that if God is real, then EVERYTHING is "illogical".(Not to the true meaning of the word)

Jesus christ what the ****, are you retarded? There's no evidence for a god, let alone the judeo-christian god. you guys are so ****ing retarded i'm going to stop posting in this thread. you're an idiot, miracles are not evidence, because they are not true and not logical. god, im done here.

Ya, things that happen don't happen. (Look, I could argue better. )

Therefore we can say that time is indeed constant and linear.

But was it always constant and linear?

 

[Faz]

The answer is to not start a thread with a reference to religion.

 

[Neo63]

I'm willing to put my faith in God, Who has explained where everything started.

You're forgetting, though, that Batman created God. And as a fan of Batman, I'm actually offended now.

If you were seriously believe that, I would respect your ideals, though definitely not agree.

People have crazy beliefs and I think they should be taken seriously whether you agree with them or not. It all comes down to how you perceive the world and are willing to interpret it, and if you're not going to change you're not going to change. If you believe something, I'm willing to let you believe that, I just wanted to show where I was from and how I saw things.

But now I must sleep.

If I believe in Fascism and racial superiority would people take me seriously and not arrest me?

Only if you put your beliefs into practice (Publicly)

So people would respect me if I'm fascist but don't practice it publicly? That makes no sense at all.

Why not?

Because fascism is wrong? and same things goes with racial superiority... the last thing that this world need is another holocaust

 

[Edward]

I'm willing to put my faith in God, Who has explained where everything started.

You're forgetting, though, that Batman created God. And as a fan of Batman, I'm actually offended now.

If you were seriously believe that, I would respect your ideals, though definitely not agree.

People have crazy beliefs and I think they should be taken seriously whether you agree with them or not. It all comes down to how you perceive the world and are willing to interpret it, and if you're not going to change you're not going to change. If you believe something, I'm willing to let you believe that, I just wanted to show where I was from and how I saw things.

But now I must sleep.

If I believe in Fascism and racial superiority would people take me seriously and not arrest me?

Only if you put your beliefs into practice (Publicly)

So people would respect me if I'm fascist but don't practice it publicly? That makes no sense at all.

Why not?

Because fascism is wrong? and same things goes with racial superiority... the last thing that this world need is another holocaust

Don't practice in public= Barely anyone will know about your beliefs.

 

[Ethan Rosen]

But was it always constant and linear?

WHY YES, YES IT WAS
YOU ARENT BEING CLEVER
THIS IS A HAIKU

 

[Neo63]

Therefore we can say that time is indeed constant and linear.

But was it always constant and linear?

way to not quote my name...

astrophysics and astronomy tells us yes, tracing back to wayyy before life existed on Earth

 

[Innocence]

Ethan: I think you're a douche too. And you're DEFINITELY not being clever.

Faz: Pretty much summed it up.

Everyone else: I give up. Not because I'm wrong, because of this: "If a person opposes even the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have walked on the moon, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. Photographs of astronauts walking on the moon, interviews with the astronauts, moon rocks...all the evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that people cannot go to the moon."

I've figured that it's pretty much true, and that people in general are douches about what they believe. I've resolved to give up forum religion debates many times, but I'm making it public. So stop me next time.

I know this could also apply in real life, but I care enough about my real life friends to actually try to convince them. Also talking is faster.

 

[qqwref]

Yes. There is plenty of evidence that there is a sentinent being, probably the Judeo-Christian God. Of course, the majority of evolutionists fail to recongnize this evidence, because they're "right". Not really. Apparently it's not scientific as it's illogical(miracles, etc.). What we need to realize is that if God is real, then EVERYTHING is "illogical".(Not to the true meaning of the word)

Jesus christ what the ****, are you retarded? There's no evidence for a god, let alone the judeo-christian god. you guys are so ****ing retarded i'm going to stop posting in this thread. you're an idiot, miracles are not evidence, because they are not true and not logical. god, im done here.

Ya, things that happen don't happen. (Look, I could argue better. )

Oh? You can?

PS: The reason people don't accept miracles is not because it isn't scientific but because, well, how do you know it happened at all? It's a much more convincing explanation to say that someone imagined/dreamt/hallucinated their religious experience than that it physically happened, and much more likely too.

 

[radmin]

The answer is to not start a thread with a reference to religion.

Yes!
Does any one else think it's ironic that the guy who started the thread hasn't posted anything other than the initial post.

 

[qqwref]

Everyone else: I give up. Not because I'm wrong, because of this: "If a person opposes even the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have walked on the moon, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. Photographs of astronauts walking on the moon, interviews with the astronauts, moon rocks...all the evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that people cannot go to the moon."

Sorry, you can't just win an argument by going "you're dumb". Most people who are not religious are perfectly willing to change their views, but obviously they will only do so if you provide enough evidence to be convincing. Saying "there is evidence" is not enough and saying "just read the Bible" is not enough.

Please provide the equivalent (in terms of believing in God) of some of the evidence you have discussed above:
- a photograph of God, or of someone meeting God
- an interview with God, or with someone who met God
- I don't know what the equivalent of moon rocks would be lol
Any obviously fake evidence would be thrown out, as in the case of the moon thing. But there IS real provable evidence that people landed on the moon; the question is whether there is actual evidence of God's existance. I think there isn't. If you want to convince people that God exists, why not post some actual evidence? Is it that you don't have any?

 

[Innocence]

Yes. There is plenty of evidence that there is a sentinent being, probably the Judeo-Christian God. Of course, the majority of evolutionists fail to recongnize this evidence, because they're "right". Not really. Apparently it's not scientific as it's illogical(miracles, etc.). What we need to realize is that if God is real, then EVERYTHING is "illogical".(Not to the true meaning of the word)

Jesus christ what the ****, are you retarded? There's no evidence for a god, let alone the judeo-christian god. you guys are so ****ing retarded i'm going to stop posting in this thread. you're an idiot, miracles are not evidence, because they are not true and not logical. god, im done here.

Ya, things that happen don't happen. (Look, I could argue better. )

Oh? You can?

PS: The reason people don't accept miracles is not because it isn't scientific but because, well, how do you know it happened at all? It's a much more convincing explanation to say that someone imagined/dreamt/hallucinated their religious experience than that it physically happened, and much more likely too.

I know, I know, I said I'd stop.

How I know that America exists? I've never been there, all I have is people's testimonies, many historical accounts, and (possibly photoshopped) images.

Edit: What I've said just before is sufficient to refute most of the above post. For everything else that you said:

text text blah text

tl:dr: The sad truth - I can't be bothered.

 

[Neo63]

Ethan: I think you're a douche too. And you're DEFINITELY not being clever.

Faz: Pretty much summed it up.

Everyone else: I give up. Not because I'm wrong, because of this: "If a person opposes even the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have walked on the moon, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. Photographs of astronauts walking on the moon, interviews with the astronauts, moon rocks...all the evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that people cannot go to the moon."

I've figured that it's pretty much true, and that people in general are douches about what they believe. I've resolved to give up forum religion debates many times, but I'm making it public. So stop me next time.

I know this could also apply in real life, but I care enough about my real life friends to actually try to convince them. Also talking is faster.

Would you oppose the possibility of the non-existence of God?

 

[Edward]

Yes. There is plenty of evidence that there is a sentinent being, probably the Judeo-Christian God. Of course, the majority of evolutionists fail to recongnize this evidence, because they're "right". Not really. Apparently it's not scientific as it's illogical(miracles, etc.). What we need to realize is that if God is real, then EVERYTHING is "illogical".(Not to the true meaning of the word)

Jesus christ what the ****, are you retarded? There's no evidence for a god, let alone the judeo-christian god. you guys are so ****ing retarded i'm going to stop posting in this thread. you're an idiot, miracles are not evidence, because they are not true and not logical. god, im done here.

Ya, things that happen don't happen. (Look, I could argue better. )

Oh? You can?

PS: The reason people don't accept miracles is not because it isn't scientific but because, well, how do you know it happened at all? It's a much more convincing explanation to say that someone imagined/dreamt/hallucinated their religious experience than that it physically happened, and much more likely too.

I know, I know, I said I'd stop.

How I know that America exists? I've never been there, all I have is people's testimonies, many historical accounts, and (possibly photoshopped) images.

But you can travel to america right now if you wanted to >.>
(If you haven't noticed, I'm remaining neutral)

 

[dannyz0r]

Yes. There is plenty of evidence that there is a sentinent being, probably the Judeo-Christian God. Of course, the majority of evolutionists fail to recongnize this evidence, because they're "right". Not really. Apparently it's not scientific as it's illogical(miracles, etc.). What we need to realize is that if God is real, then EVERYTHING is "illogical".(Not to the true meaning of the word)

Jesus christ what the ****, are you retarded? There's no evidence for a god, let alone the judeo-christian god. you guys are so ****ing retarded i'm going to stop posting in this thread. you're an idiot, miracles are not evidence, because they are not true and not logical. god, im done here.

Ya, things that happen don't happen. (Look, I could argue better. )

Oh? You can?

PS: The reason people don't accept miracles is not because it isn't scientific but because, well, how do you know it happened at all? It's a much more convincing explanation to say that someone imagined/dreamt/hallucinated their religious experience than that it physically happened, and much more likely too.

I know, I know, I said I'd stop.

How I know that America exists? I've never been there, all I have is people's testimonies, many historical accounts, and (possibly photoshopped) images.

Edit: What I've said just before is sufficient to refute most of the above post. For everything else that you said:

text text blah text

tl:dr: The sad truth - I can't be bothered.

How do you know you're really in Australia? Maybe everybody is plotting against you and just feeding you lies and you're really in America.

 

[Hyprul 9-ty2]

Yes. There is plenty of evidence that there is a sentinent being, probably the Judeo-Christian God. Of course, the majority of evolutionists fail to recongnize this evidence, because they're "right". Not really. Apparently it's not scientific as it's illogical(miracles, etc.). What we need to realize is that if God is real, then EVERYTHING is "illogical".(Not to the true meaning of the word)

Jesus christ what the ****, are you retarded? There's no evidence for a god, let alone the judeo-christian god. you guys are so ****ing retarded i'm going to stop posting in this thread. you're an idiot, miracles are not evidence, because they are not true and not logical. god, im done here.

Ya, things that happen don't happen. (Look, I could argue better. )

Oh? You can?

PS: The reason people don't accept miracles is not because it isn't scientific but because, well, how do you know it happened at all? It's a much more convincing explanation to say that someone imagined/dreamt/hallucinated their religious experience than that it physically happened, and much more likely too.

I know, I know, I said I'd stop.

How I know that America exists? I've never been there, all I have is people's testimonies, many historical accounts, and (possibly photoshopped) images.

Edit: What I've said just before is sufficient to refute most of the above post. For everything else that you said:

text text blah text

tl:dr: The sad truth - I can't be bothered.

Oh wow you're so mature, when I grow up I want to be just like you!
At least admit that you're giving up. Btw America doesn't exist, the only continent that exists is Japan.

 

[Innocence]

Ethan: I think you're a douche too. And you're DEFINITELY not being clever.

Faz: Pretty much summed it up.

Everyone else: I give up. Not because I'm wrong, because of this: "If a person opposes even the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have walked on the moon, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. Photographs of astronauts walking on the moon, interviews with the astronauts, moon rocks...all the evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that people cannot go to the moon."

I've figured that it's pretty much true, and that people in general are douches about what they believe. I've resolved to give up forum religion debates many times, but I'm making it public. So stop me next time.

I know this could also apply in real life, but I care enough about my real life friends to actually try to convince them. Also talking is faster.

Would you oppose the possibility of the non-existence of God?

You're not helping with my pledge to not participate.

And I would, but I can't. How can we possible exist without something to create us. Sure though, apart from the initial creation, if you can show me something to counter all the years of evidence and revelation I've seen, I'll be willing to consider it.

At Above post: That was almost as mature as my post. FYI, I DID admit that I was giving up. Just not that I was wrong.

 

[Neo63]

Yes. There is plenty of evidence that there is a sentinent being, probably the Judeo-Christian God. Of course, the majority of evolutionists fail to recongnize this evidence, because they're "right". Not really. Apparently it's not scientific as it's illogical(miracles, etc.). What we need to realize is that if God is real, then EVERYTHING is "illogical".(Not to the true meaning of the word)

Jesus christ what the ****, are you retarded? There's no evidence for a god, let alone the judeo-christian god. you guys are so ****ing retarded i'm going to stop posting in this thread. you're an idiot, miracles are not evidence, because they are not true and not logical. god, im done here.

Ya, things that happen don't happen. (Look, I could argue better. )

Oh? You can?

PS: The reason people don't accept miracles is not because it isn't scientific but because, well, how do you know it happened at all? It's a much more convincing explanation to say that someone imagined/dreamt/hallucinated their religious experience than that it physically happened, and much more likely too.

I know, I know, I said I'd stop.

How I know that America exists? I've never been there, all I have is people's testimonies, many historical accounts, and (possibly photoshopped) images.

If you think like that, nothing exists, not even yourself, everything is an illusion. reminds me of a clip of a movie someone posted here a while ago.

 

[qqwref]

How I know that America exists? I've never been there, all I have is people's testimonies, many historical accounts, and (possibly photoshopped) images.

Edit: What I've said just before is sufficient to refute most of the above post. For everything else that you said:

text text blah text

tl:dr: The sad truth - I can't be bothered.

tl;dr: I don't have any evidence for God, but my parents told me, so it MUST be true! And even if God was true I bet you'd never believe it. Stupid atheists. I'm better than you because I can believe silly things even with no evidence at all!

 

[Neo63]

Ethan: I think you're a douche too. And you're DEFINITELY not being clever.

Faz: Pretty much summed it up.

Everyone else: I give up. Not because I'm wrong, because of this: "If a person opposes even the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have walked on the moon, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. Photographs of astronauts walking on the moon, interviews with the astronauts, moon rocks...all the evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that people cannot go to the moon."

I've figured that it's pretty much true, and that people in general are douches about what they believe. I've resolved to give up forum religion debates many times, but I'm making it public. So stop me next time.

I know this could also apply in real life, but I care enough about my real life friends to actually try to convince them. Also talking is faster.

Would you oppose the possibility of the non-existence of God?

You're not helping with my pledge to not participate.

And I would, but I can't. How can we possible exist without something to create us. Sure though, apart from the initial creation, if you can show me something to counter all the years of evidence and revelation I've seen, I'll be willing to consider it.

Neither can I. If you can prove to me that God exists, NOT from someone's account of something that they saw or some coincidence with the Bible, then I'm willing to reconsider as well.

btw ever heard of the Invisible Pink Unicorn and the Russell's teapot?

 

[JBCM627]

Therefore we can say that time is indeed constant and linear.

But was it always constant and linear?

astrophysics and astronomy tells us yes

They do?