cpt.Justice
Regular
When will the single record be broken? It's getting pretty old (399 days) 
All that is needed is one very easy scramble in a big competition.
All that is needed is one very easy scramble in a big competition.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kind of.
I wouldn't consider Erik's WR scramble to be 'easy' unless you knew enough to find the good solution. Tip: Know your 2x2x2.![]()
Kind of.
I wouldn't consider Erik's WR scramble to be 'easy' unless you knew enough to find the good solution. Tip: Know your 2x2x2.![]()
Maybe we should change to average 10(12) for 2x2 and pyra in competitions?
Century just startedRowe is fast![]()
Understatement of the century.
Kind of.
I wouldn't consider Erik's WR scramble to be 'easy' unless you knew enough to find the good solution. Tip: Know your 2x2x2.![]()
C'mon. That was really easy.
Kind of.
I wouldn't consider Erik's WR scramble to be 'easy' unless you knew enough to find the good solution. Tip: Know your 2x2x2.![]()
You need to learn what easy means.
Did Erik see the LL skip too or just the OLL skip? If not then they would have to do 7 moves + picking up and putting down the cube + seeing LL skip.re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?
2.39, 1.93, (3.35), 2.26, (0.91) = 2.19
Basically, the 2x2 event is broken until somebody learns optimal 2x2
re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?
Rowe is fast![]()
Understatement of the century.
2.39, 1.93, (3.35), 2.26, (0.91) = 2.19
Basically, the 2x2 event is broken until somebody learns optimal 2x2
re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?
Erik's WR single is not easy. Of all the top 10 2x2 results, his was the most difficult to perform. They are all 4-5 move solves , and erik's was 8.
I think what they're saying is that while scramble is easy, getting 0.96 on it is not.2.39, 1.93, (3.35), 2.26, (0.91) = 2.19
Basically, the 2x2 event is broken until somebody learns optimal 2x2
re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?
Erik's WR single is not easy. Of all the top 10 2x2 results, his was the most difficult to perform. They are all 4-5 move solves , and erik's was 8.
I would argue that it is easy. It was not as easy to perform as some of the other top solves, but clearly luck is involved in that scramble, as is any scramble where someone could sub-1 it.
Did Erik see the LL skip too or just the OLL skip? If not then they would have to do 7 moves + picking up and putting down the cube + seeing LL skip.
Maybe we should change to average 10(12) for 2x2 and pyra in competitions?