[WR] Rowe Hessler 2.45 2x2 Average

Kind of.

I wouldn't consider Erik's WR scramble to be 'easy' unless you knew enough to find the good solution. Tip: Know your 2x2x2. :p

C'mon. That was really easy.

Well, yeah... Just don't know how many people would see that solution.

Kind of.

I wouldn't consider Erik's WR scramble to be 'easy' unless you knew enough to find the good solution. Tip: Know your 2x2x2. :p

You need to learn what easy means.

:fp
 
2.39, 1.93, (3.35), 2.26, (0.91) = 2.19

Basically, the 2x2 event is broken until somebody learns optimal 2x2 :P

re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?
 
re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?
Did Erik see the LL skip too or just the OLL skip? If not then they would have to do 7 moves + picking up and putting down the cube + seeing LL skip.
 
2.39, 1.93, (3.35), 2.26, (0.91) = 2.19

Basically, the 2x2 event is broken until somebody learns optimal 2x2 :P

re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?

Erik's WR single is not easy. Of all the top 10 2x2 results, his was the most difficult to perform. They are all 4-5 move solves , and erik's was 8.
 
2.39, 1.93, (3.35), 2.26, (0.91) = 2.19

Basically, the 2x2 event is broken until somebody learns optimal 2x2 :P

re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?

Erik's WR single is not easy. Of all the top 10 2x2 results, his was the most difficult to perform. They are all 4-5 move solves , and erik's was 8.

I would argue that it is easy. It was not as easy to perform as some of the other top solves, but clearly luck is involved in that scramble, as is any scramble where someone could sub-1 it.
 
2.39, 1.93, (3.35), 2.26, (0.91) = 2.19

Basically, the 2x2 event is broken until somebody learns optimal 2x2 :P

re:single WR - that time is not 'easy' ***. Why don't you nay-sayers try and do 7 moves in 0.96 including picking up and putting down the cube, and why don't you try it in a nerve-wracking competition environment too?

Erik's WR single is not easy. Of all the top 10 2x2 results, his was the most difficult to perform. They are all 4-5 move solves , and erik's was 8.

I would argue that it is easy. It was not as easy to perform as some of the other top solves, but clearly luck is involved in that scramble, as is any scramble where someone could sub-1 it.
I think what they're saying is that while scramble is easy, getting 0.96 on it is not.
 
first and 2nd scrambles were ridiculous. I actually didn't really like the last scramble.
3.01, 1.22, 6.74, 7.76, 2.51
CLL, obvious, Ortega, Ortega, obvious.
That's it, I should learn full CLL.
 
Back
Top