So there's this kid on youtube...

This just keeps getting better!

I explained in clearer detail about it and he said...

ben1996123 said:
I know of no lies contradictions or fake videos on my channel, I average 25 seconds on the 3x3, and 8 on the 2x2, I think you are looking at my all time personal best times on my channel?

This is freakin' Hilarious!
 
This kid is such an idiot. In the video where he solves all his puzzles, he gets a 58 second something on the 3x3 and then has a video where he gets 9 seconds. Impossible! Then he says his best time on the 5x5 is 2 minutes, where he gets a 13 minute solve in that video. I can go on and on...
 
Stefan. Did you not see his channel?
2x2 - 0.55 seconds - lucky
2x2 - 0.84 seconds - non-lucky
2x2 BLD - 7.61 seconds
3x3 - 9.55 seconds - lucky
3x3 - 15.54 seconds - non-lucky
4x4 - 54.03 seconds
5x5 - 2:41.45
6x6 - 5:12.19
7x7 - 8:47.31
Megaminx - 3:12.75
15 puzzle - 6.98 seconds
Pyraminx - 2.34 seconds
Clock - 12.26 seconds
Clock BLD - 2:06.46
Magic - 0.98 seconds
Master magic - 6.99 seconds (performed on a magic rings)
Magic rings - 6.99 seconds
Snake - 4.71 seconds
Square 1 - 47.32 seconds
Whip-it! - 1.77 seconds
Braintwist - 1:51.49 (I was just playing with it. I dont actually know how to solve it)




.84 non-lucky 2x2 solve
he starts all of his magic solves already holding the magic.
look at the difference of times between various videos.
a 58s 3x3 solve in one video, and a 9s solve in another.
 
Stefan. Did you not see his channel?
I did check out his channel, did check out some of his videos, did check out the evidence in this thread, and came to the conclusion that he's honest. Some of the evidence against him is flat out wrong, much is flawed, and none is convincing.

> .84 non-lucky 2x2 solve
This could be true, or he might just have a different definition of "lucky" than the one we use.

> he starts all of his magic solves already holding the magic.
So what? He's not claiming this to be WCA-compatible. And I personally am very interested in the pure solve time, less in the time wasted picking up and putting down the puzzle.

> look at the difference of times between various videos.
> a 58s 3x3 solve in one video, and a 9s solve in another.
How old are those two videos?
 
Last edited:
using some computer magic I have made a scramble that matches his for the sub 10 3x3 video. Scramble with red on F and yellow U.

L' U2 R2 B2 L' D2 R B2 L' F2 L' D' L2 U' L2 F' U F'

I got a 6.20 on it lol.
 
Stefan. I understand where you are coming from; this all seems just so sketchy...
What do you recommend I do?

I would take down my video, but I'm not sure that he's not cheating. I'm more or less leaning on the opinion that he is cheating, but also keep in mind the fact that, even if he is cheating, he's about 13 years old. Sure, he should know better than to do so, but unfortunately, he does not, and I don't think that berating a 13-yr old is any better than cheating.

So. What are your thoughts?
Leave the vid. up, or remove it, and forget it?


I would def. remove it right now if he would bother to respond to *any* negative comments; the fact that he doesn't really makes me respect him less.
 
i'm a "fake b*tch" apparently. so he says on my pyraminx video. that's definitely true, everyone knows in competition i only get like a 30second average... :|
he's going to block me he says... oh woe is me.. hah.
 
Back
Top