does anyone know a faster square-1 meathod?

[joecubes]

i currently use thrawst's meathod as shown in his youtube video, and i average around 1:30.00 min to 1:40.00 min. i want to know if any body knows a faster meathod or maybe just some faster algorithms.

please and thank you

 

[Dene]

cubezone.be

 

[trying-to-speedcube...]

BAUM BAUM BAUM BAUM BAUM BAUM!!!!!

Sorry

jmbaum.110mb.com/square1.htm

 

[joecubes]

thanks! i will look into it and try to learn it.

 

[joecubes]

thank you too. this one looks a bit more complicated but i will still learn it.

 

[Me]

cubezone.be

I second that site and want to start memorizing some of them myself.
The method I teach just doesn't cut it anymore and isn't very consistent at all.

 

[joecubes]

cubezone.be

I second that site and want to start memorizing some of them myself.
The method I teach just doesn't cut it anymore and isn't very consistent at all.

when i first started solving the square-1 your meathod worked great! im just getting a little faster and i want to try and break sub-1min

 

[trying-to-speedcube...]

thank you too. this one looks a bit more complicated but i will still learn it.

You think Baum is more complicated than Vandenbergh?
It's maybe a bit more intuitive in the first steps, but when performed correctly, this method has a similar movecount to Vandenbergh's method. Recognition is also easier in my opinion.

And, half the algorithms

 

[joecubes]

thank you too. this one looks a bit more complicated but i will still learn it.

You think Baum is more complicated than Vandenbergh?
It's maybe a bit more intuitive in the first steps, but when performed correctly, this method has a similar movecount to Vandenbergh's method. Recognition is also easier in my opinion.

And, half the algorithms

lol its just it takes me a while to learn square-1 algorithms. idk why but it takes me while to count to 3 lol

edit: your right, i was looking at vandenbergh's method and it is somewhat similar, and i swear i used an algorithm right and it f'ed up my square-1 so i had so re-solve it.

 

[Dene]

I recommend this site for every single algorithm used by the current World Record holder in Square-1. You might be surprised to see that he uses so few algorithms! And you should be; he is absolutely beastly insane.
To solve the Square-1 using the most primitive version of the Vandenbergh method, you only need the first algorithm from each step (CO is done intuitively).

 

[blade740]

Dan uses a lot more algs than that now. He learned CP parity and more EPs, I believe.

 

[masterofthebass]

Dan uses a lot more algs than that now. He learned CP parity and more EPs, I believe.

Yes, I've learned parity CP and almost 1 look EP, but the website includes all the algs from when I was 3rd in the world (18.xx average)

 

[Stefan]

Yes, I've learned parity CP and almost 1 look EP, but the website includes all the algs from when I was 3rd in the world (18.xx average)

You learned hundreds of moves just to solve some plastic toy a little bit faster? Geek. Get a life.

 

[anythingtwisty]

Lol Stefan.

 

[rahulkadukar]

I use a very primitive method but still am able to average 50 to 60 seconds

 

[Dene]

Dan uses a lot more algs than that now. He learned CP parity and more EPs, I believe.

Yes, I've learned parity CP and almost 1 look EP, but the website includes all the algs from when I was 3rd in the world (18.xx average)

Are you serious? How many EPs have you learnt in my ignorance? Darn you! I have barely touched my sq1...

 

[masterofthebass]

Yes, I've learned parity CP and almost 1 look EP, but the website includes all the algs from when I was 3rd in the world (18.xx average)

You learned hundreds of moves just to solve some plastic toy a little bit faster? Geek. Get a life.

Are you serious? How many EPs have you learnt in my ignorance? Darn you! I have barely touched my sq1...

Learning the 4 algs (+ mirrors) for Parity CP knocks out 1/2 of the EPs. I then learned only about 2 more algs. I have 4 cases left to learn. There are really only 19 "cases" (including U/D and L/R mirrors). Also, some of my EPs are still done with 2 adj/adj, since they are basically optimal.

 

[Dene]

Ah ok. I really need to learn the rest of the CP parity algs...

 

[DavidWoner]

thank you too. this one looks a bit more complicated but i will still learn it.

You think Baum is more complicated than Vandenbergh?
It's maybe a bit more intuitive in the first steps, but when performed correctly, this method has a similar movecount to Vandenbergh's method. Recognition is also easier in my opinion.

And, half the algorithms

Name one person who is sub-25 with Jason's method.

 

[Escher]

thank you too. this one looks a bit more complicated but i will still learn it.

You think Baum is more complicated than Vandenbergh?
It's maybe a bit more intuitive in the first steps, but when performed correctly, this method has a similar movecount to Vandenbergh's method. Recognition is also easier in my opinion.

And, half the algorithms

Name one person who is sub-25 with Jason's method.

Name one person who is sub 13 (sub 12?) with ZZ. Doesn't make it not fast