Oct 13, 2007 #21 Lotsofsloths Veteran Joined Sep 6, 2007 Messages 1,250 Location Williamsburg, VA WCA ID 2007SAHA01 YouTube Visit Channel Actually, a 4 look means that you can solve the full LL in 4 looks (1st is EO, 2nd CO, 3rd CP, 4th EP) assuming you solve in that order of course. So full Fridrich would be a 2 look. Click to expand... Oh.. I was close
Actually, a 4 look means that you can solve the full LL in 4 looks (1st is EO, 2nd CO, 3rd CP, 4th EP) assuming you solve in that order of course. So full Fridrich would be a 2 look. Click to expand... Oh.. I was close
Oct 13, 2007 #22 TimMc Premium Member Joined Aug 12, 2007 Messages 1,741 Location Melbourne, Australia WCA ID 2009MCMA01 Johannes91 said: Also, there are three L's in "4-look LL" so I think you should say 4LLL. Click to expand... As you said, "4-look LL", the 4-look being hyphenated would mean it's overkill showing the extra L. It's implied O.O
Johannes91 said: Also, there are three L's in "4-look LL" so I think you should say 4LLL. Click to expand... As you said, "4-look LL", the 4-look being hyphenated would mean it's overkill showing the extra L. It's implied O.O
Oct 13, 2007 #23 C clincher Regular Joined Aug 21, 2007 Messages 146 TimMc said: Johannes91 said: Also, there are three L's in "4-look LL" so I think you should say 4LLL. Click to expand... As you said, "4-look LL", the 4-look being hyphenated would mean it's overkill showing the extra L. It's implied O.O Click to expand... Yes but on your first post you only wrote "4LL" I think that's what johannes meant
TimMc said: Johannes91 said: Also, there are three L's in "4-look LL" so I think you should say 4LLL. Click to expand... As you said, "4-look LL", the 4-look being hyphenated would mean it's overkill showing the extra L. It's implied O.O Click to expand... Yes but on your first post you only wrote "4LL" I think that's what johannes meant
Oct 14, 2007 #24 TimMc Premium Member Joined Aug 12, 2007 Messages 1,741 Location Melbourne, Australia WCA ID 2009MCMA01 clincher said: TimMc said: Yes but on your first post you only wrote "4LL" I think that's what johannes meant Click to expand... One could also argue the point that it's bad to abbreviate it with a number instead of having "Four", especially if it's a title of a method :-/ Click to expand...
clincher said: TimMc said: Yes but on your first post you only wrote "4LL" I think that's what johannes meant Click to expand... One could also argue the point that it's bad to abbreviate it with a number instead of having "Four", especially if it's a title of a method :-/ Click to expand...