New Method or this Method exist? Block 2x2x2 in 3x3

[Deleted member 27249]

I thinked so you use a 2x2 scramble in 3x3 Example: U2 R' U' F U' F2 U' R U R U2
And you use reverse alg do you find Solution for solve 3x3 when block 2x2x2 exist in 3x3.
Prove this scramble in 3x3 and you can create a new Method for 3x3 if you creation a set algs with scrambles for 2x2 when you use inverse alg to scramble 2x2 and memorize patterns for 3x3.

 

[Christopher Mowla]

Petrus?

 

[Deleted member 27249]

Petrus?

No Petrus...you solve the Pieces with 11 moves no Method only algs to solve the rest cube.
First step solve block 2x2x2
Second step use an alg for solve rest Pieces.

 

[Christopher Mowla]

@cuBerBruce mentioned here that the rest of the pieces (after a 2x2x3) is completed is at least 18 (not 11) moves. (The example he provided. I guess just put that scramble into CubeExplorer and see that the optimal solution is 18 face turns.)

• Logically, it will also be at least 18 moves for a completed 2x2x2.
• And that's a lot of cases (algs) to tackle with just one algorithm.

Is this a new method? If you manage to generate an alg set for all cases, I am guessing it would be.

 

[acrystal]

idk, it would be more than 6-7M algs

 

[Deleted member 27249]

@cuBerBruce mentioned here that the rest of the pieces (after a 2x2x3) is completed is at least 18 (not 11) moves. (The example he provided. I guess just put that scramble into CubeExplorer and see that the optimal solution is 18 face turns.)

• Logically, it will also be at least 18 moves for a completed 2x2x2.
• And that's a lot of cases (algs) to tackle with just one algorithm.

Is this a new method? If you manage to generate an alg set for all cases, I am guessing it would be.

I dont want generate new Method I generated in past CFBL for 3x3 with manually no programs.