Flying Bananas Open 2025 Competition started

[Spartacus]

OH

Spoiler

Generated By csTimer on 2025-08-23
avg of 5: 27.87

Time List:
1. 26.17 D B2 U L2 B2 F2 D B2 L2 D F2 U L' R2 D' F' U2 B2 F' U'
2. 26.36 U R D2 F2 R2 F' R2 U2 B' D2 F' D2 F' D' L' B' R' D2 R F R
3. (36.89) F2 R2 F' L2 D2 F' U2 F2 L2 B R2 L D' L D2 R B L R' F
4. (23.98) R F' D F' R' F2 U R2 B' L2 U' R2 L2 B2 L2 B2 D F2 U' R2
5. 31.08 U2 B2 L' D' R2 F R F U2 F' U2 L2 D2 L2 B2 U2 B' U' F2

I'm not going to do clonk

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

Bro, we all saw you got a 30 or 50 average before

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

I TOLD THE TRUTH I DO VLS AND GOT A PLL SKIP. THIS IS REAL!

WR ao5 in 3x3

Spoiler: WR Ao5 of 3.40 seconds

3.09, 3.50, 5.50, 3.60 and 2.87 WR Single

1. If what everyone says is true, and you do avg 30-50, the solutions would have to be 7-20 moves, and you are not Levi Gibson.
2. Let's say you did use VLS and PLL for the 35.x avg, that is a horrible F2L time(assuming it takes 1-3 seconds to do each case).
3. PLL being 21 algs(not much) and VLS being 432(comparable to ZBLL), you would have to memorize 453 algs, which is simply unreasonable unless its useful.
4. If the times you claim are real, I don't see why it'd be a problem to just provide a video of an example solve.
5. I'm pretty sure VLS and PLL Skip is just considered 1LLSLL


So... by chance are you related to Charlie Holmes?

 

[eeeeeeeee]

1. If what everyone says is true, and you do avg 30-50, the solutions would have to be 7-20 moves, and you are not Levi Gibson.
2. Let's say you did use VLS and PLL for the 35.x avg, that is a horrible F2L time(assuming it takes 1-3 seconds to do each case).
3. PLL being 21 algs(not much) and VLS being 432(comparable to ZBLL), you would have to memorize 453 algs, which is simply unreasonable unless its useful.
4. If the times you claim are real, I don't see why it'd be a problem to just provide a video of an example solve.
5. I'm pretty sure VLS and PLL Skip is just considered 1LLSLL


So... by chance are you related to Charlie Holmes?

nah
hes related to martin






martin telesforo

 

[Caleb Valenzuela]

nah
hes related to martin






martin telesforo

lol that’s a good one

 

[CAPTAINVALPO96]

Bro needs to realize for it to be WR it needs to be in comp… and then for it to be WB it needs to be filmed

Bro thinks he can get world class solves when we aren’t getting good times ourselves we would see stupidly easy scrams too

 

[That0newe1rdo]

Bro needs to realize for it to be WR it needs to be in comp… and then for it to be WB it needs to be filmed

Yeah.

Anyway, @Z3Cubingfan i assume you have 3 choices (other organisers pls agree)

1 - your average is 34.xx or whatever it was.

2 - you stick by your word, saying its true, possibly causing your disqualification, if you spam for it and whoever disqualifies you didnt make more posts in a similar time frame (@Thomas.Caleb ahhh)

3 - Number 2, but you can prove it with a video of some solves (w/scrambles)

At the same time i want to get this comp to run well so i want this over asap.

 

[Averageof12]

Yeah.

Anyway, @Z3Cubingfan i assume you have 3 choices (other organisers pls agree)

1 - your average is 34.xx or whatever it was.

2 - you stick by your word, saying its true, possibly causing your disqualification, if you spam for it and whoever disqualifies you didnt make more posts in a similar time frame (@Thomas.Caleb ahhh)

3 - Number 2, but you can prove it with a video of some solves (w/scrambles)

At the same time i want to get this comp to run well so i want this over asap.

Bro just disqualify him if he doesn't post a video soon, it's so obviously fake plus you saw the real average early, why are we giving this kid the benefit of the doubt when so much evidence is clear, just because he's 10 doesn't mean he should just win the comp.

 

[That0newe1rdo]

Bro just disqualify him if he doesn't post a video soon, it's so obviously fake plus you saw the real average early, why are we giving this kid the benefit of the doubt when so much evidence is clear, just because he's 10 doesn't mean he should just win the comp.

Yeah ik, but a writing a 34. avg and a 3.4 avg is different by a decimal point location.

Ig if the other organisers are alr with it he has to do so by the time submission for r1 ends ?
Idk, maybe just disqualify now.

 

[Averageof12]

Yeah ik, but a writing a 34. avg and a 3.4 avg is different by a decimal point location.

Ig if the other organisers are alr with it he has to do so by the time submission for r1 ends ?
Idk, maybe just disqualify now.

There's still the idea that getting a sub 3.5 avg has never really been done before, I find it hard to believe some random 10 year old got one before Max Park or Tymon or even Yiheng

 

[bluecubing]

dropping out

 

[ILCubing]

Sorry for the bump, but we gotta start back up
Doing OH now oops

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

There's still the idea that getting a sub 3.5 avg has never really been done before, I find it hard to believe some random 10 year old got one before Max Park or Tymon or even Yiheng

only once

 

[bldcuber314]

only once

I don't even get why this is still an argument just dq the results and move on they're not real

 

[CAPTAINVALPO96]

Bump

 

[That0newe1rdo]

Bump

Oh yh forgot about this.

Here are my times (i forgot to send the other day)
3x3 : 17.32, 18.94, 17.68, 16.54
,17.45 = 17.48 ao5

Decent average of 5, im happy with it.

OH : 30.65, 1:09.65, 59.34, 1:04.23, 55.42 = 59.66 ao5.

Nice sub 1, not pb by a bit but still good.

Clock : 17.45, 19.89, 24.85, 20.54, 17.62 = 19.35 ao5

Cool sub 20 ao5.