I know about thing when you solve something without changing one layer and then reversing, but many algorithms I have seen don't do that.
I wonder how people came up with those algorithms?
I know about thing when you solve something without changing one layer and then reversing, but many algorithms I have seen don't do that.
I wonder how people came up with those algorithms?
in my opinion, trangium's batch solver is the best website that does that, though it has a bit of a learning curve. i tend to find that if you want one alg, you want a whole set of them, which is exactly what it does.
I'd recommend whatching some of Jperm's videos on cube theory.
they are really intuitive and beginner friendly.
then you can go on and see how Jperm tries to solve some non-wca puzzles for himself, figuring algs on the fly by using the same strategies... that is: trying some common triggers and taking notes on what pieces they affect then using some conjugates and basic logic to solve more and more stuff
This is probably obvious but I was learning Ga perm and noticed it's actually
[R2 U R' U : R'] [D : [U', R']]
what's suspicious is the Rs aren't "balanced", like if you add up all the R turns you end up with an extra R'