Mefferts or eastsheen? (4x4x4)

Mefferts or Eastsheen (4x4x4)?


  • Total voters
    187
Eastsheen avg of 5: 1:17.75
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKsz2veZeg8
Mefferts avg of 5: 1:20.73
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um2MwZ6sXpc

normally I am like 2 seconds faster with the mefferts but not on video ^^ oh and by the way, that eastsheen isn't really broken in, it's the safety one from a friend which he borrowed me and which got solved maybe 80-100 times before..

some few facts from my sight (too lazy to think about writing more right now)...

Mefferts:
Pros:
- cutting corner
- got a real good feel on the outer layers

cons:
- big
- corner pieces can break (2 in one solve at mine -___-)

Eastsheen:
pros:
- amazingly fast right away
- nice smooth feel at all, like there is no friction in this cube..

cons:
- sometimes locks (depending on your turning style too) but not that much as people claim...
 
Last edited:
Another con to ES: if used too much, it gets way too loose to use. My ES is currently in that state; I used to solve it in around 1:20, now I can't get sub-1:30 to save my life.

I use a c4y new 4x4x4 now. I can get sub-minute on good solves.
 
Another con to ES: if used too much, it gets way too loose to use. My ES is currently in that state; I used to solve it in around 1:20, now I can't get sub-1:30 to save my life.

I use a c4y new 4x4x4 now. I can get sub-minute on good solves.

Aren't there adjustable screws on the ES 4x4?

I don't own one, BTW.

There are, but i wouldnt suggest touching them...EVER. Theyre really sensitive and dont really need to be touched.

My ES is still really good...i dont have any problems with it at all. I luv it :) but i didnt vote for it because i havent tried a mefferts so i cant really make a comparison...
 
There are these pieces between the edges of ES cubes. What if we took them out? Would the cube still turn well? (assuming it already turns well)

No. After one of them popped in mine (too loose), I took it out of the puzzle. It refused to turn, quite literally. The internal pieces make motion possible on an ES, and also serve to hold the puzzle together.
 
Yeah, Nakajima is the main reason why I haven't given up on my ES yet.

@puzzlemaster: I think you're right about the mechanism being the problem.
 
Last edited:
how about spring modding it and then rounding all of the pieces? maybe more pop susceptible but possibly more cutting? i also agree that there has to be a way to make it better... lets think about yu's eastsheen.. him playing with it that much must have rounded off which pieces? that being said if we can figure out which pieces were rounded by the turning, we could maybe artificially create this by sanding those pieces.
 
Oh his 4x4x4 average of 12 video, Nakajima even put in the description that he was awaiting the arrival of his Mefferts...

--------------------------------------------

How do these cubes compare in size to the current Rubik's 4x4? It's a nice size, and I wouldn't at all mind a little bigger. Not too much, though...
I wouldn't say I have small hands, but they are definitely not big.

I'm probably going to order a mefferts, but that depends of how big the price difference is, and if a mefferts just seems too big.
 
Back
Top