Method Platform time solve in LL

[Eli Satterfield]

This seems really confusing

 

[Deleted member 27249]

Yes, but 2LLL is less algs than your method, easier to recognize, and likely has better algs as well

I can understand that.
but an inventor of something wants to be known.
think there are worse and better known methods.
I just want to be known.
why is bob burton on the pyraminx more known?

 

[Deleted member 36445]

I can understand that.
but an inventor of something wants to be known.
think there are worse and better known methods.
I just want to be known.
why is bob burton on the pyraminx more known?

bob burton??
never heard of him lol

 

[Deleted member 27249]

At least I got a laugh out of you

 

[Deleted member 27249]

however I would have been happy to make a contribution.
But apparently nothing can against CFOP.
i know is more simple recognize cases.

 

[Deleted member 36445]

however I would have been happy to make a contribution.
But apparently nothing can against CFOP.
i know is more simple recognize cases.

Dude if you permit me...

Go to the wiki and make a well written article about your method, make a site on Google sites or GitHub documenting it and that's it.

You can register your method, but getting people to use it is another story

Since you posted, lots of people said that recognition is not practical and algs are not optimized for speed.

You said you didn't understand why people don't like it, but I think you are not listening.

But it is your method and even if people don't want to use it you can still work on it, get better times and improve the method.

take a look at mgls method for example. I think it's fine but do you know anyone else except lucas garron that uses it? I don't. There may even be but you get the point.

Some algs of mgls are useful but using it as main it's something to consider

 

[Deleted member 27249]

Dude if you permit me...

Go to the wiki and make a well written article about your method, make a site on Google sites or GitHub documenting it and that's it.

You can register your method, but getting people to use it is another story

Since you posted, lots of people said that recognition is not practical and algs are not optimized for speed.

You said you didn't understand why people don't like it, but I think you are not listening.

But it is your method and even if people don't want to use it you can still work on it, get better times and improve the method.

take a look at mgls method for example. I think it's fine but do you know anyone else except lucas garron that uses it? I don't. There may even be but you get the point.

Some algs of mgls are useful but using it as main it's something to consider

I can't listen because having invented it I also like it very much in fact I'm too fond of it. Personally I don't find it hard to recognize cases but because I developed it. So yes I could improve it for personal use. In my case it is easy to understand but I realize that the ability to reconnaissance for those who seek to learn it is more difficult. I made a wiki page but not very well done. But I think it makes no sense to keep asking others if they want to use it because I know that CFOP is easier to understand and then has fewer algorithms.
However, I understood that the important thing is that I feel comfortable using it for myself.