SpartanSailor
Member
Just did another round of 3BLD practice... got 2/3 success! All around 7:30-8:00 range. Looked like the DNF was and odd target mix and I didn’t do the parity.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

It's probably a lot easier when you can execute in under 15s!I think the challenge with full audio is having the audio loop maybe get too large to recall. If you can do it full audio, it seems like it has to be better, but it seems so ridiculously hard to me to put a whole 3x3x3 in audio memory.
I don't get why using rooms for 3BLD would be slower. If you're memoing images anyway, why would it be slower to memo them in a particular place rather than in an arbitrary place?
Some fast solvers have told me they don't really form images at all, they just memo as a sentence because it's faster. I agree with that. Forming images does take time. When I do corners-only solves I use sentences and it is both faster and easier; but in a full 3BLD I can't retain a sentence for long enough unless I turn some or all of it into images.
I think the challenge with full audio is having the audio loop maybe get too large to recall. If you can do it full audio, it seems like it has to be better, but it seems so ridiculously hard to me to put a whole 3x3x3 in audio memory.
It's probably a lot easier when you can execute in under 15s!
^---- This. Execute fast enough that you don't have time to forget
Exactly. I always choose my room as part of my pre-solve psyching up. Just before my solve, with my fingers on the timer, I pause for a few seconds and visualise that room empty. Then I lift the cover and fill the room.I agree. When your room is pre determined. It doesn't even take up time to conjure it up. It's just there. I've started using this lately because I often have a long pause between edge and corner execution. I find picturing something "nowhere" makes it a lot more forgettable.
Beginners method? Do you mean M2/OP, OP/OP, or 3-style?It's not like that in my experience. You must be fast but execution of algs must be brainless. This means two things:
- if you use 3style algs one needs to practice them a lot till they become nautaral and brainless;
- if you use OP or M2/OP one needs to practice them a lot but not as many times as in the case of 3style. It is around 50 algs vs. almost 800 algs in 3style. With beginners method one can solve 3bld in 1 minute and less.
Beginners method? Do you mean M2/OP, OP/OP, or 3-style?
I assume you mean OP/OP. I’m a long way from being able to use 3-style, but I’m interested to see it explained so I can better appreciate it. Any good videos recommended?
I mean OP/OP or OP/M2. Really one can solve sub1 - theres a lot evidences for that. If you memo cube in 15-20 seconds: 40 seconds is enough to solve the cube.
When one reaches the point of sub 20 memo they should really already be considering 3Style, if not already implementing it.
Nationals (here in the states) is using a 4:00 qualifying time... sub-1 would probably place top 3 in anything I could attend locally!! But they don’t do much BLD stuff here. I have seen a couple comps dedicated to BLD and all it’s events, but not “local” enough to go watch.I mean OP/OP or OP/M2. Really one can solve sub1 - theres a lot evidences for that. If you memo cube in 15-20 seconds: 40 seconds is enough to solve the cube.
I dont agree with it. It's up of preferences of the solver. For some of them sub1 is enough. For others - no. For me OP was boring so I've started 3style for corners when my memo was around 1 minute. I'm not sure if it was good choice but at the point I'm, I'm happy I use 3style.
I find picturing something "nowhere" makes it a lot more forgettable.
Well, IMO it is objectively wasteful (time, effort and most especially movecount-wise) to spam TPS on a couple algs when one could have the exact same times with a fraction of the mechanical effort.
Spaming few algs is much easier than learing 800 algs.![]()