I call BS.

The situation is that I don't really believe your 55, but I would like to believe it (and yes, I do hope you're legitimate), even though I can't without some sort of proof. I'm finding it quite annoying that people are criticising me for asking for proof, and unfortunately the only way to argue against them is to take the position that "Robert may very well be a cheater and I need confirmation he isn't". I continue to find it disturbing that people in this community find the very idea of not believing a time to be suspect and immoral, since after all we DID have someone who has been proved to have cheated in an official tournament and to have thus stolen more than a thousand dollars from us.
 
it's really sad that we have people calling each other "tools" and facetiously asking for proof otherwise. can we grow up, please?

listen, either the guy makes the video and michael believes him or he doesn't and michael doesn't. what michael believes on this topic should be unimportant to anyone else. maybe this wasn't the best medium for him to ask about the time, but he did, and that's that. nothing we can do about that now. now let's just move on because at the end of the day it's just NOT THAT IMPORTANT.
 
Thanks Kian, I was just about to post something like that.

@Michael: Don't worry I think you kinda have good reasons to believe I'm a cheater, I have good reasons to believe that "garzon" is a cheater (for those who know who I'm talking about)
 
Robert-Y said:
Thanks Kian, I was just about to post something like that.

@Michael: Don't worry I think you kinda have good reasons to believe I'm a cheater, I have good reasons to believe that "garzon" is a cheater (for those who know who I'm talking about)
Click to expand...

Yeah, who *is* Garzon Gonzales? A Google search for ""garzon gonzales" cube" turns up... nothing.
 
Michael, you did a 31.18 on the computer 4x4 and you skipped 4 edges during edge pairing, plus you had a PLL skip. Seriously, can you really think that my 55 is a fake now? :P (since the luck I had on the 5x5x5 is less than what you had for your 4x4x4 solve)
 
Robert-Y said:
Michael, you did a 31.18 on the computer 4x4 and you skipped 4 edges during edge pairing, plus you had a PLL skip. Seriously, can you really think that my 55 is a fake now? :P (since the luck I had on the 5x5x5 is less than what you had for your 4x4x4 solve)
Click to expand...

oh come on let's not get into THIS now.
You will have a video up you said? so we just wait until then :)
 
I'm just merely trying to convince Michael that it's not fake before the video gets posted for fun lol. It's kinda funny for me because I'm the only one who truly knows that my solve is not fake :D
 
I just want to make sure, though, you know? (Also, the 31 was really easy, just like the 35 before it... A good nonlucky time for me is 37ish. When I got the 35 it was so lucky I thought I'd never beat it, and indeed it took a long time for me to even get another sub-40!)
 
qqwref said:
I just want to make sure, though, you know? (Also, the 31 was really easy, just like the 35 before it... A good nonlucky time for me is 37ish. When I got the 35 it was so lucky I thought I'd never beat it, and indeed it took a long time for me to even get another sub-40!)
Click to expand...

You got probably at least 5 sub-40s yesterday. :D
So I guess this thread is for indicting suspicious people on hi-games.net?

Garzon is very suspicious. If you look at his 4x4 solve, the 3x3 stage is very slow and his look ahead and turning speed are bad.

What about 54?
He's #54 for 4x4 and his 10X10 times are really awesome and 3 minutes faster than his 9x9...
He's not even sub-20 for 3x3 and has a horrible 31 WPM.
 
fanwuq said:
Garzon is very suspicious. If you look at his 4x4 solve, the 3x3 stage is very slow and his look ahead and turning speed are bad.

What about 54?
He's #54 for 4x4 and his 10X10 times are really awesome and 3 minutes faster than his 9x9...
He's not even sub-20 for 3x3 and has a horrible 31 WPM.
Click to expand...

That could be for many reasons. One, he could have done the 9x9 just once so he could be ranked.

I personally hate doing really big cubes on hi-games. 9x9 is my least favorite on hi-games basically because well, why not do 10x10?
 
This is really off the topic of this, but after watching some replays on hi-games, I decided to sign up, but I haven't received the confirmation email yet, and it's been at least 30 minutes. How long does it usually take?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

acrystal
I need help with my method (i forgot to mention, im calling it "Orcora Petrus")
2
Replies
26
Views
2,423
abunickabhi
abunickabhi
eeeeeeeee
Google AI, I do not want to be associated with Caleb Valenzuela calling me out
Replies
2
Views
526
Caleb Valenzuela
Caleb Valenzuela
kim suo
I proudly call it the GAN356S "Panda".
Replies
2
Views
655
kim suo
kim suo
Lord_Oscar
Calling for new Auckland delegates!
Replies
0
Views
421
Lord_Oscar
Lord_Oscar
abunickabhi
Should 3-style be called something else to avoid confusion about the word style
Replies
1
Views
661
Kami
Kami
Back
Top