They are definitely worth learning: they're the most common PLLs. You'll get a G perm in over a fifth of your solves (unless you know some OLLCP). They're also not that bad. They're better than N/V/F perms.
They are definitely worth learning: they're the most common PLLs. You'll get a G perm in over a fifth of your solves (unless you know some OLLCP). They're also not that bad. They're better than N/V/F perms.
4/21 chance, 19%. Not quite one fifth. Good video nonetheless, but I feel like everyone that says "it's just the same alg 4 times" is being a little inefficient. There's a reason most people these days don't just do Jb with their left hand to do Ja, right? There are more efficient G perms you can use if you learn them as 4 separate Algs, so just doing the mirror and inverse might put someone in a bad habit.
Actually the odds are 2/9, because PLLs with rotational symmetry are less common than those without. Since G-perms have no rotational symmetry, they have a 1/18 chance of occurring, and since there are 4 different G perms...
I'm sure TDM knows this but was just rounding it off.