[Unofficial] 3x3x4 20.796 Single

[Wilhelm]

Got this earlier today. As far as I know its the second best time on Youtube sooo yay! But apparently I'm too dumb to get the camera in focus or rather hold the cube in the focused area while I'm solving
The Scramble was easy and I got lucky
-B2 R2 B2 D2 M2 u2 M2 F2 R2 D U2 S2 M2 B2 U F2 D' u F2 L2 u L2 B2 M2 D F2 U L2 U M2 U' L2 U2 R2 U2 R2 B2 D' M2 D2
Yesterday I had a ridiculous scramble but somehow screwed it up and only got a 29 and then 15 second try
-M2 S2 M2 B2 M2 S2 L2 U' S2 U2 F2 U' B2 U' D' L2 F2 R2 U S2 u2 B2 u2 B2 L2 D2 F2 M2 F2 R2 B2 U' R2 B2 D' L2 S2 D2 S2 L2

I also got a 32.207 Ao5 and 37.429 Ao12 which both beat my old records and should be UWR's .

 

[Randomno]

What method and how many LL algs do you know?

 

[Wilhelm]

I just do 2 2x3x3 solves and try to blockbuild as much as I can on the first layer of each of them. I've tried different methods but this one works out for me for now. For the second 2x3x3 solve I only use R, U and D moves so I dont destroy the middle layers.
For the LL I only know 7 algs. I'm currently learning some more for annoying cases.

 

[Randomno]

I just do 2 2x3x3 solves and try to blockbuild as much as I can on the first layer of each of them. I've tried different methods but this one works out for me for now. For the second 2x3x3 solve I only use R, U and D moves so I dont destroy the middle layers.
For the LL I only know 7 algs. I'm currently learning some more for annoying cases.

I use that too, I really suck at it though.

 

[MTGjumper]

I also got a 32.207 Ao5 and 37.429 Ao12 which both beat my old records and should be UWR's .

I'm pretty sure David Woner averaged in the low 30s at one point.

 

[Wilhelm]

Makes sense considering he got the UWR single . The page still says that Michael holds the Avg UWR's. Nobody put my previous ones in so I decided to break them again.

 

[Randomno]

Makes sense considering he got the UWR single . The page still says that Michael holds the Avg UWR's. Nobody put my previous ones in so I decided to break them again.

Add them yourself.

 

[martinss]

Add them yourself.

I did it (just a few seconds after HE signed up ! )

 

[Wilhelm]

Ta! Actually would not have though that everybody can edit it

 

[shawnyboy]

3x3x4???!!!

 

[Randomno]

Ta! Actually would not have though that everybody can edit it

I have it on my watchlist so I think it'll stay correct.

 

[Berd]

That's cool! Which 3x3x4 should I get? GJ!

 

[Wilhelm]

I use a C4U which is decent. It has some CC and is very controllable. I haven't tried the Calvin one yet ^^

 

[ryanj92]

You need to use a higher aperture on your camera or something...

 

[natezach728]

From the title, I thought it was either a 3x3x3 solve or 4x4x4 solve. Turns out it was "both". Great solve! Really cool to watch.

 

[EMI]

Nice solve! Why didn't you use the standard H-perm? I'd think it is faster...

 

[Wilhelm]

I find it a bit awkward to fingertrick because the puzzle is not cubic. But I don't think it makes a huge difference ^^