Hello fellow speedsolvers!
I have been into cubing for 4.5 months, learning fridrich as my first method. I learned all the PLLs and OLLs before I could average 40. Now I average 25.
Please read my first post!
I had 13 PLL skips in last three days.
No idea how many cubes done total.
I know chance for a PLL skip is 1/72, considering all the possible permutations of the LL after OLL, but is this really so in practice? I mean, can the way of scrambling affect the PLL?
I don't use computer generated scrambles. I generally do Lw or Lw' and then some Us and D's, repeat, repeat, repeat... then cube rotation and repeat, repeat... then throw in some (R' F' R2 U')s. (yes, it's the R PLL finish... I can practice algorithms while scrambling
)
I once got the exact same scramble (only 'shifted' in color) using my algorithm twice in a row. It was very strange since it was a pretty long scramble (my guess 40 moves). All the same F2L pairs, same OLL, same PLL...
So it's possible I learned to do a few scrambles from muscle memory and I don't notice the sameness of the scrambles, since they can be hours apart. So I can have a "PLL skip" scramble, ugly F2L scramble (a lot of these
)...
Then there's also a tiny possibility of having solved ~(72 * 13 = 936) cubes in 3 days
...
Do the computer-generated scrambles really generate a random distribution after F2L + OLL or just F2L? How about just after applying the scrambles?
And for the end...
How much do you PLL skip?
I have been into cubing for 4.5 months, learning fridrich as my first method. I learned all the PLLs and OLLs before I could average 40. Now I average 25.
Please read my first post!
I had 13 PLL skips in last three days.
No idea how many cubes done total.
I know chance for a PLL skip is 1/72, considering all the possible permutations of the LL after OLL, but is this really so in practice? I mean, can the way of scrambling affect the PLL?
I don't use computer generated scrambles. I generally do Lw or Lw' and then some Us and D's, repeat, repeat, repeat... then cube rotation and repeat, repeat... then throw in some (R' F' R2 U')s. (yes, it's the R PLL finish... I can practice algorithms while scrambling
I once got the exact same scramble (only 'shifted' in color) using my algorithm twice in a row. It was very strange since it was a pretty long scramble (my guess 40 moves). All the same F2L pairs, same OLL, same PLL...
So it's possible I learned to do a few scrambles from muscle memory and I don't notice the sameness of the scrambles, since they can be hours apart. So I can have a "PLL skip" scramble, ugly F2L scramble (a lot of these
Then there's also a tiny possibility of having solved ~(72 * 13 = 936) cubes in 3 days
Do the computer-generated scrambles really generate a random distribution after F2L + OLL or just F2L? How about just after applying the scrambles?
And for the end...
How much do you PLL skip?