Zaxef
Veteran
Please be sure to select one of the last two options!
I use the Big Cubes method for 5x5 but I'm curious to see if people use the same method for 4x4 and 5x5.. Since it seems to me that AvG would be much faster on 4x4 than just random pairing, so I'm curious to see what others do..
And I'm aware there are many types of 4x4 edge pairing methods such as 3/6 at a time, and there are different orders like 2-2-2-2-2-2 and 6-3-2 etc (those are probably wrong but you know what I mean)
I'm just trying to distinguish if people use random pairing like Big Cubes or they use some kind of 2/3/6 "at a time" method.
I use the Big Cubes method for 5x5 but I'm curious to see if people use the same method for 4x4 and 5x5.. Since it seems to me that AvG would be much faster on 4x4 than just random pairing, so I'm curious to see what others do..
And I'm aware there are many types of 4x4 edge pairing methods such as 3/6 at a time, and there are different orders like 2-2-2-2-2-2 and 6-3-2 etc (those are probably wrong but you know what I mean)
I'm just trying to distinguish if people use random pairing like Big Cubes or they use some kind of 2/3/6 "at a time" method.
Last edited: