4weeksAndImSub60
Regular
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 73
LMAO this thread is full of funny.
To the original poster: You are really not a fast learner if it took you a whole month to get sub60. I would consider you to be less-than-average, at the very least.
Furthermore: there is no better method than Fridrich, or some variant. Get used to it or prove us wrong. But don't insult us.
...right. Because 4 weeks is equivalent to 1 month and you've taken the time to plot me on a graph in which every cuber is included... which is how you were able to determine that I am "less-than-average, at the very least." If in any case you don't have any statistics to support your notion that I am "less-than-average, at the very least" then I suggest you keep that dirty mouth of yours shut to limit all the senseless ******** that you post.