[WR] Brandon Lin - 8.45 Square-1 average

[AlexMaass]

 

[asacuber]

wow sub9 :O

 

[OLLiver]

wow. I think sub 8 is possible in the near future

can someone explain CSP to someone who is literally in the bottom 5 for squan in the world.
Is it comparable to learning full ZBLL or something?

 

[bcube]

can someone explain CSP to someone who is literally in the bottom 5 for squan in the world.

Here you go.

 

[Lid]

Here you go.

That is about CP not CSP.

 

[Torch]

That is about CP not CSP.

The thread is about CPParity, but the post he linked to has links about CSParity.

 

[Ollie]

Well done Brandon! (And Matt Sheerin, who quite frankly deserves some recognition by now.)

wow. I think sub 8 is possible in the near future

can someone explain CSP to someone who is literally in the bottom 5 for squan in the world.
Is it comparable to learning full ZBLL or something?

You recognize parity in inspection, before you do cubeshape.

Then you perform one of two algorithms for each cubeshape case to avoid parity.