What method do you think I'd be good at?

[Crickets]

Well yeah, I'm at around 49-55 secs avg for my beginners method with 2-look OLL and a beginners method corners PLL and I use U perms for my edges.

Methods I've dabled in: Petrus, Roux, Hiese(very little), and the f2l of Fridrich


I don't want to break any records here(for now lol) I just want to be able to get low 30s avgs and maybe break into the 20s

When I have tried Roux I didn't like it cause I am like retarted(sorry if that offends anybody) in my left hand. Idk maybe I just need more practice.

Also if theres another method you think I might be better at or even another puzzle. You can ask me questions about me if you need to.

 

[Waynilein]

If your left hand is bad, you might want to give ZZ a go, since most of the solve is done with just R and U turns.
http://www.emsee.110mb.com/Speedcubing/ZZ speedcubing system.html

 

[Ellis]

If you're doing layer-by-layer now I think you you should just go to fridrich, its an easy transition with not as much more to learn.

If your left hand is bad, you might want to give ZZ a go, since most of the solve is done with just R and U turns.
http://www.emsee.110mb.com/Speedcubing/ZZ speedcubing system.html

Don't you use your left hand more in ZZ than with fridrich? I've never tried ZZ but I always thought that since most of the solve was in the RUL subgroup that there would be more of a balance between right and left than with fridrich.

 

[Waynilein]

Uh, depends. You can solve the right side first and then do a z-turn (takes just a split second), allowing you to continue with R and U.

 

[MistArts]

Continue to use what you are using then work on LL a bit.