[video] Easy PLL Skip Cases for OLL

Rubiks560

Nub
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
2,851
Location
Minnesota
WCA ID
2009OLSO01
YouTube
Visit Channel

People on here probably know a lot of these, but I figured I'd post it just in case.

edit: the embed tool doesn't seem to be working, so I'll just leave the link I guess.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For the second case, I think B' R' U' R U B is way faster. First, it's faster to do, and no U2 before.

Also for the mirror of the sexy hammer, I find F R U' R' U R U R' F' is faster because of no U2.

Finally, I like r' U r2 U' r2 U' r2 U r' better than the lefty alg you showed. It would also be fun to show the other blocky fat-sunes, such as R U2 R' U2 R' F R F' and mirrors, ect..
 
For the second case, I think B' R' U' R U B is way faster. First, it's faster to do, and no U2 before.

Also for the mirror of the sexy hammer, I find F R U' R' U R U R' F' is faster because of no U2.

Finally, I like r' U r2 U' r2 U' r2 U r' better than the lefty alg you showed. It would also be fun to show the other blocky fat-sunes, such as R U2 R' U2 R' F R F' and mirrors, ect..

I like that trick for the F sexy F'.

I'm pretty sure I listed your alg for sexy hammer in the video.

I like the lefty alg way more. IMO it's faster than both the right algs. I could have added more cases, but there's a bunch I didn't know, and I figured 17 would be enough for one video. I can always make a second. :P
 
One way I like going about learning algs is I just learn the mirror, inverse, and inverse mirror or any given alg, and adding each of those to your my alg list. Later I'll learn the commonly used case for the alg, and that's why I only know about 30 OLLs but I know 50 algs haha. Depends on the case, but it's usually pretty useful for OLLCP type stuff. Sometimes I'll do it the other way around, but I usually do it this way.

Heres an example. I learned the alg for the W shape OLL (R U R' U R U' R' U' R' F R F') and I was able to learn its mirror, and the inverses of each (Bad P) with little extra work. 4 algs for the price of one!
 
For those block-like L cases at 4:00 I always used the regular sized moves, like (x) R' U R2 D' R2 U' R2 D (x'). Would the other way, using wide slices, be more ergonomic? I've always used it this way, I didn't even know you could do it with wide slices for a while.
 
Back
Top