UWR Pyra 0.71 ao5 1.29 ao12 by Dylan Chan!

SM cubing

Regular
Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Messages
213
Location
From just outside of the universe
WCA ID
2018MACK04
Dylan Chan recently broke ao5 and ao12 UWR for pyraminx. the solves are here:
2.770
1.189
1.997
2.170
1.700
0.774
0.645
0.753
0.757
0.658
0.718
1.922
the last five solves before the 1.922 were the average of 5. If anyone can add this to the uwr page it would be greatly appreciated. btw dylan chan is not me.
 
Dylan Chan recently broke ao5 and ao12 UWR for pyraminx. the solves are here:
2.770
1.189
1.997
2.170
1.700
0.774
0.645
0.753
0.757
0.658
0.718
1.922
the last five solves before the 1.922 were the average of 5. If anyone can add this to the uwr page it would be greatly appreciated. btw dylan chan is not me.
Not to raise suspicion and doubt about the times, but getting 6 sub 1 solves on Pyra seems a bit unlikely (and sub WR at that), and I personally think that before the times get added to the UWR page then some scrambles and explanations are needed.

This is not meant to start any sort of controversy (or hate from/to anyone) so please do not start that, and in the end Pyra times can come down to luck but this seems a bit to lucky to randomly happen.
 
Dude i completly understand, the scrambles are here:
1. (2.277) B U B L' U' B' L' B' l' r' u'
2. 1.189 R' U' R' L' R' B' L R l r
3. 1.997 U R B R' U' L R U' l b
4. 2.170 R B L' B U' R U' L l'
5. 1.700 U R' U R' L' B' U B r'
6. 0.774 U L B' L' B U' B R
7. (0.645) L' B U' B' U B L U'
8. 0.753 U' R' U R' B' R' U R
9. 0.757 L R B' L' B L' R L
10. 0.658 R' U L' U L B U R'
11. 0.718 U R U' B' R' B R U'
12. 1.922 U' R B R' U R B R' l'
 
Without any actual proof I'm not going to believe that someone (who from his wca profile seems to be a kid) who only has 1 sub-4 pyra average and only has a 2.13 pr single officially.
Too may times people try to cheat for good boy points and try to be the amazing person in the spotlight.
Not saying it's impossible, but not going to believe it without some proof first
 
I understand, infact im a little shocked myself, so what kind of proof would you need?

If we could have a video of him executing the 0.645 and 0.658 solves sub-0.7, I'd be much more likely to believe this.

(Ideally I'd like to see him do all of these solves in the times he claims, but if that's too much to ask, I think the 2 fastest should suffice. I don't really care if it takes multiple tries; if he proves with video evidence that he can achieve those times then we at least have something to go off.)
 
Dude i completly understand, the scrambles are here:
1. (2.277) B U B L' U' B' L' B' l' r' u'
2. 1.189 R' U' R' L' R' B' L R l r
3. 1.997 U R B R' U' L R U' l b
4. 2.170 R B L' B U' R U' L l'
5. 1.700 U R' U R' L' B' U B r'
6. 0.774 U L B' L' B U' B R
7. (0.645) L' B U' B' U B L U'
8. 0.753 U' R' U R' B' R' U R
9. 0.757 L R B' L' B L' R L
10. 0.658 R' U L' U L B U R'
11. 0.718 U R U' B' R' B R U'
12. 1.922 U' R B R' U R B R' l'
the 0.77 was 5 moves so not comp legal
 
Back
Top