Two paths of MBLD improvement : adding more cubes or shaving off time

MBLD improvement path

  • Add one more cube after sub-houring X cubes

    Votes: 4 66.7%
  • Do Y cubes (over the hour) and try to get it sub-hour by improvement

    Votes: 2 33.3%

  • Total voters
    6

abunickabhi

Legend
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
14,623
Location
Yo
WCA ID
2013GHOD01
YouTube
Visit Channel
In my limited understanding, there are two ways to get more cubes added to your multi as we improve in BLD skills and time management.

1. Add one/two more cubes after sub-houring X cubes
Pros:
  • Good competition practice as we do not exceed the hour too many times
  • We get a good estimate of one hour time limit
  • Incremental progression with less fails

Cons:
  • Less ambitious
  • Less old-style practice
  • We have to tinker with memo review system after adding cubes as we need to manage memo/exec time better
  • Tough to compare attempts done with different number of cubes, no apple-apple comparison

For example, I can do 22 cubes sub-hour now, so I can try 23 cubes in my next attempt and try to get it sub-hour as well

2. Do Y cubes (over the hour) and try to get it sub-hour by doing the attempt faster
Pros:
  • Always a fixed number of cubes, so constant information for our brain
  • We are sure about what number of cubes we wish to attempt in our ideal MBLD attempt
  • We have more time to memo the cubes
  • Fixed memo review system, as we do not have to worry about more cubes or changing our pack configuration
  • Variance of memo and exec times will be less as we have constant number of cubes, which leads to easier analysis and statistics

Cons:
  • Need to get more cubes
  • More mental effort if we choose a lot more cubes than we are capable of, to sub-hour
  • Less official 1 hour type practice, so poor time management

For example, I can do 24 cubes in 1 hour 10 minutes, so I have to only worry about shaving off those 10 minutes


Which path of improvement is faster and more stable?
Is it personal preference?
I would prefer 2 over 1, as the practice with same number of cubes set a good constant for my brain and good for documentation and analysis.
 
I always used approach 1, so I voted for that, because I think it helped with my overall accuracy. I believe that approach has led to my being highly accurate in competition.

That being said, I think there is one significant negative to it: it leads to multi always being a fairly miserable experience. As you get better, it just keeps getting harder and harder. Approach 2 means it feels easier as you get better, which might motivate you to practice more.
 
I much prefer the second approach. I've consistently found that my improvement rate is always a pleasant surprise when trying a couple more cubes than I think/know I can do. In fact, my current short-term MBLD plan is that I'll get a few more cubes in next week and grind 41 cubes a ton until I can sub hour that.
 
Back
Top