PLL's little brother: NEO-PLL

[Kirjava]

You mean OLL/PLL/NeoPLL? You need all of them.

There's nothing explicitly /wrong/ with it, I just don't see it viable enough to be useful. It's one potentially learnable subset of many.

I do not foresee it outperforming partial edge control, for example.

On an unrelated note, I'd learned three of the 'NeoPLL' cases before this thread popped up already for something else ^_^.

 

[jms_gears1]

So what's wrong with OLL/NeoPLL?

because the OLL would just be leading to another OLL case that you use a set of algs to solve in 1 look. Instead of using OLL which would go to all pieces oriented, and then PLL which has much nicer algs, and recognition seems like itd be easier.

Until you can address the issue of worse algs and recog. It wont be anywhere near worth it.

 

[jms_gears1]

You mean OLL/PLL/NeoPLL? You need all of them.

There's nothing explicitly /wrong/ with it, I just don't see it viable enough to be useful. It's one potentially learnable subset of many.

I do not foresee it outperforming partial edge control, for example.

On an unrelated note, I'd learned three of the 'NeoPLL' cases before this thread popped up already for something else ^_^.

lol, so how many algs do you need to learn?

assuming theres an alg for each of the 40 cases that flip 0,2,4,6 thats 160 isnt it?