PLL or OLL

[littlejkim]

Ok.. I started cubing about two months ago, and now I'm averaging ~ 45 s but I can't decided whether to do all the PLLs or the OLLs first. (I do 2-look Oll and Pll with a Type C and a Old Type A 1) thanks ALOT

 

[AndyRoo789]

PLL's first DEFINITELY.

 

[Cyrus C.]

PLL, less algorithms & more improvement.

 

[littlejkim]

Ok. Thanks. Just a quick question, is a ~ 45 sec average ok for a 2 month old cuber?

 

[littlejkim]

just checking if i'm normal

 

[qqwref]

I think that's pretty good for someone who's only two months old! Having that kind of speed at that age is quite impressive - you could give that 7-year-old girl a run for her money!

(But seriously... just look at your times, don't worry about where you are after a certain point. Everyone improves at their own rate. Faz was almost sub-20 in two months, whereas it took me about two years to get under 20 seconds and two more years to average under 14.)

 

[CubesOfTheWorld]

PLL first. Its faster to learn, and takes a bigger chunk off of your time. you can get 25 averages without OLL. Maybe only 30-35 without PLL

 

[Cyrus C.]

PLL first. Its faster to learn, and takes a bigger chunk off of your time. you can get 25 averages without OLL. Maybe only 30-35 without PLL

You can get Sub-15 with 3LLL Sub-20 with 4LLL.

 

[Hadley4000]

PLLs first. A 2 look OLL is shorter than a 2 look PLL.

 

[littlejkim]

Ummm.. First. I would like to clarify that I am NOT 2 months old, but rather 2 months old in cubing. Sorry, my fault. anyway, so i have decided I should learn the PLLs. Thanks all of you