aaronb
Veteran
Pops can mess up your recognition, and you could be slow to get back up to speed. So you can't just say 22 - 8 = 14 and 2:10 - 14 = 1:56. The time might have been closer to 1:50 without the pop.
[WR] Kevin Hays - 6x6 Single (1:54.81) and MO3 (2:02.13)
- Thread starter Hays
- Start date
Pops can mess up your recognition, and you could be slow to get back up to speed. So you can't just say 22 - 8 = 14 and 2:10 - 14 = 1:56. The time might have been closer to 1:50 without the pop.
TheAwesomeAlex
Regular
Last edited by a moderator:
uberCuber
Legend
Awesome, very well done! 
Hays
Veteran
Probably not that fast, more like 1:56 or so.
Sebastien
Premium Member
I just see fluent turning before the pop and right after fixing the pop. The rest seems obvious to me.
Faz
Former Clock NR Holder
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2008
- Messages
- 4,250
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- WCA ID
- 2009ZEMD01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Crazy fast solves - The interview posted above was pretty funny too 
Last edited by a moderator:
Florian
Veteran
The interview is funny.
@Hays does practicing 6x6 helps you alot in 5x5?
@Hays does practicing 6x6 helps you alot in 5x5?
Hays
Veteran
I'm assuming so. Although I was stuck at like 1:12 average for a while when I was just practicing 6x6. Then I started practicing 5x5 and I dropped a ton, so I still need to do 5x5 in order to get significantly better at it.
CuberMan
Regular
congrats! can't wait to see you breaking the world record again with sub 2 mean.
5BLD
Legend
that was ridiculous beyond ridiculous...
IanTheCuber
Regular
It locked up while solving edges, and you did a lot of rerotations (U, U'), and you still managed to get the WR.
FTW the mean, that is completely insane...
FTW the mean, that is completely insane...
Similar threads
