Is your OLL or PLL faster?

[4Chan]

It was something I was wondering earlier, whilst practicing (or practising, depending on what side of the atlantic ocean you live on.) for Big Cubes Summer. I got a pll skip on 4x4, and a couple solves later, an oll skip.

I wondered, which was more worthwhile? Which do I execute faster?
I then decided to ask the speedsolving.com community to see what their response would be.

Also, i am unsure if a poll of this nature was created before or not. D:
I did use the seach function, but was not very thorough.

 

[Lord Voldemort]

OLLs are usually shorter and easier to recognize.

 

[PlutoCuber]

i only know 31 oll algorithms so i have to go with pll

 

[amostay2004]

Generally OLLs are faster but it also depends on the case..like I can do H-perm faster than a dot OLL but no PLL is as fast as an anti-sune..

 

[xXdaveXsuperstarXx]

I will say OLL, because PLL has some very nasty cases that take forever to execute. OLL has some pretty bad cases too. But PLL's are longer, so that's why I would say OLL is faster. If you are not using FULL OLL you're not in a position to say OLL is slower. I am not using full OLL, but I can do OLL almost as fast as PLL, so I assume that when I master OLL I should it should be faster then PLL.

 

[Sa967St]

OLLs are almost always faster then PLLs for me. My PLLs are kinda slow ._."

 

[dueone]

my PLL is sucks.... my PLL time attack is about 70...
my OLL is good, but some case it is suck to.. XD
but i still vote for OLL is much faster, and the move less than PLL

 

[endless_akatsuki]

My PLLs are crap. Especially v-perms. That's something that I really should work on, because a maybe sub-14 solve turns into a 15.