Easy LBL guide done in reverse

[Tyjet66]

This is my first guide, tell me what you think. I did all the moves while facing the back face to make the algorithms (saved in the video description) easier to learn.

 

[Kirjava]

Cool idea doing it from the back. Bit of an odd LBL variation though, I think everyone should be teaching some 8355 varient as the standard beginners method these days tbh.

 

[Tyjet66]

Cool idea doing it from the back. Bit of an odd LBL variation though, I think everyone should be teaching some 8355 varient as the standard beginners method these days tbh.

This was the original method I had learned, I thought it was easy when I first started.

 

[Kirjava]

You are not everyone.

 

[Tyjet66]

Did I claim to be?

 

[Cride5]

I think everyone should be teaching some 8355 varient as the standard beginners method these days tbh.

Me too. The standard beginner LBL last-layer is terrible for beginners. 8355 is simple, minimises algs, and will eventually promote better understanding of the cube than LBL (imho). I think the main reason people like to teach LBL is its obvious transition to Fridrich. I personally regard that as a negative, not a positive

 

[Kirjava]

Did I claim to be?

I don't think you understand why I said what I said.

 

[jms_gears1]

Did I claim to be?

I don't think you understand why I said what I said.

Because 8335 would be a better choice, logically, for a majority of people than his method. Plus just because it was easy for him does not mean that its easy for everybodies?

Just ask Aki

 

[MiloD]

Did I claim to be?

I don't think you understand why I said what I said.

I do; you're the forum ***hole .

 

[riffz]

I can't be bothered to watch the whole thing, but one thing I noticed right away is that the lighting is too bright and makes it hard to see the sticker colours.

Also, although you did it from that angle for better viewing, I think the ultimate angle is from your viewpoint like badmephisto because then you can still demonstrate how you would execute the algorithms yourself. Most beginners won't care about that part but I think its still good to portray the algorithms the way that they could be executed fast.

 

[Kirjava]

Did I claim to be?

I don't think you understand why I said what I said.

I do; you're the forum ***hole .

I'm not sure if you understand, either.

 

[dabmasta]

Did I claim to be?

I don't think you understand why I said what I said.

I do; you're the forum ***hole .

I'm not sure if you understand, either.

Then elaborate already

 

[megaminxwin]

When I first saw the title, I thought you were doing it from the top down.

Then I realised that that's sort of what Dan Brown does.

 

[Kirjava]

Did I claim to be?

I don't think you understand why I said what I said.

I do; you're the forum ***hole .

I'm not sure if you understand, either.

Then elaborate already

jms_gears1 already did.

 

[JTW2007]

When I first saw the title, I thought you were doing it from the top down.

I thought it was going to be a scramble using only inverted beginner method algs, but in reverse order.