Ded

1. 4.19 @Jorian Meeuse
2. 4.70 @Swagrid
3. 6.23 @Discomantis

Discomantis is eliminated.

The final scramble set is:
1. L2 F2 L' F2 L' U2 L' B2 D' B' D B' L2 U2 L' U
2. R2 D B2 R2 U B2 U' R2 U' B2 D2 R B U2 B' R' D U'
3. B L2 B' L2 F L2 B' U2 R2 F' D2 F' R' B U2 R' U2
4. R B' R' U' R U B R' F2 L2 F' R2 D2 B D2 R2 F2 L2 F
5. F' L' U' L U2 F R2 U B2 U R2 U' R2 U' B2 R2

E: avg of 5: 5.43
 
Here are the scrambles:
1. F' U2 F R U R' F' U2 F U' R U R' F' U F R U R' F' U F R U' R' U R U R' U F' U F U F' U' F
2. F' U F R U R' U' R U2 R' U2 F' U2 F R U2 R' U' R U2 R' U F' U2 F R U R' F' U' F R U R' F' U F
3. R U2 R' U F' U2 F U2 R U' R' U2 F' U F U' R U' R' F' U2 F U2 F' U F R U R' F' U F R U2 R'
4. F' U F U' F' U F U' F' U' F U' F' U' F U R U' R' F' U' F U' R U2 R' F' U' F U R U R'
5. U2 R U R' U F' U2 F U' F' U2 F U' R U' R' F' U' F U' F' U F U' F' U F R U R' F' U2 F
Sorry it took so long, I couldn't copy and paste on my tablet.
 
Here are the scrambles:
1. F' U2 F R U R' F' U2 F U' R U R' F' U F R U R' F' U F R U' R' U R U R' U F' U F U F' U' F
2. F' U F R U R' U' R U2 R' U2 F' U2 F R U2 R' U' R U2 R' U F' U2 F R U R' F' U' F R U R' F' U F
3. R U2 R' U F' U2 F U2 R U' R' U2 F' U F U' R U' R' F' U2 F U2 F' U F R U R' F' U F R U2 R'
4. F' U F U' F' U F U' F' U' F U' F' U' F U R U' R' F' U' F U' R U2 R' F' U' F U R U R'
5. U2 R U R' U F' U2 F U' F' U2 F U' R U' R' F' U' F U' F' U F U' F' U F R U R' F' U2 F
Sorry it took so long, I couldn't copy and paste on my tablet.
As you can see, the competition continued to run in your absence. All we need now is for Jorian to solve, and then we can move to the next event.
 
1. 4.19 @Jorian Meeuse
2. 4.70 @Swagrid
3. 6.23 @Discomantis

Discomantis is eliminated.

The final scramble set is:
1. L2 F2 L' F2 L' U2 L' B2 D' B' D B' L2 U2 L' U
2. R2 D B2 R2 U B2 U' R2 U' B2 D2 R B U2 B' R' D U'
3. B L2 B' L2 F L2 B' U2 R2 F' D2 F' R' B U2 R' U2
4. R B' R' U' R U B R' F2 L2 F' R2 D2 B D2 R2 F2 L2 F
5. F' L' U' L U2 F R2 U B2 U R2 U' R2 U' B2 R2

E: avg of 5: 5.43
3.16
4.19
4.76
5.36
3.65

Average: 4.20
 
Here are the scrambles:
1. F' U2 F R U R' F' U2 F U' R U R' F' U F R U R' F' U F R U' R' U R U R' U F' U F U F' U' F
2. F' U F R U R' U' R U2 R' U2 F' U2 F R U2 R' U' R U2 R' U F' U2 F R U R' F' U' F R U R' F' U F
3. R U2 R' U F' U2 F U2 R U' R' U2 F' U F U' R U' R' F' U2 F U2 F' U F R U R' F' U F R U2 R'
4. F' U F U' F' U F U' F' U' F U' F' U' F U R U' R' F' U' F U' R U2 R' F' U' F U R U R'
5. U2 R U R' U F' U2 F U' F' U2 F U' R U' R' F' U' F U' F' U F U' F' U F R U R' F' U2 F
Sorry it took so long, I couldn't copy and paste on my tablet.
Now that you have had time to practice more, here are the scrambles for the next round.
 
Now that you have had time to practice more, here are the scrambles for the next round.
We needed to speed up the competition, so we posted scrambles ourselves, as they weren't posted for days after the round finished.

We also need a faster format. With the current number of events everyone is going to do, and if each round took 1 day, and everyone submitted on time, then using some math, all rounds would take 46 days.

I think most people would not be willing to do 1 round every day for 46 days straight.

So, if possible, could you please make this competition go a bit faster?
 
We're resuming from where we left off.
The only competitors are @Swagrid, @Jorian Meeuse, @Discomantis, and @EthanMCuber
Why, though? I understand you would like to be the one hosting the competition entirely, but I hope you understand that for us, it's not reasonable to randomly have to wait a week for a round in a competition that already takes so long. Now if we redo all the rounds we did when you were gone, that'll take another week or so, probably, meaning this comp will take over half a month (the time swagrid waited before posting scrambles himself + the time between us finishing this event and starting to redo these rounds + the time redoing that round takes) longer than it would have usually. If that keeps happening, it's just not fun anymore.
 
I was practicing RU 2gen to get my 2GLL recognition to improve and got this insane average with incredibly easy scrambles

Gegenereerd door csTimer op 2023-08-11
avg of 5: 2.80

Lijst met tijden:
1. (1.57) U' R U2 R2 U' R' U' R2 U' R2 U R U R' U
2. 2.88 R' U2 R2 U R U' R U2 R2 U' R' U R2 U2 R'
3. (6.50) U2 R2 U2 R' U' R' U R U' R' U' R2 U' R' U
4. 3.43 R2 U R U R' U R2 U R U2 R U' R U R'
5. 2.10 R' U R U' R U2 R2 U2 R2 U2 R2 U2 R U R'
The 2.10 would have been 1.02 if executed with the same TPS as the 1.57 lol

Let's hope we get this type of scrambles in this competition now haha
 
Why, though? I understand you would like to be the one hosting the competition entirely, but I hope you understand that for us, it's not reasonable to randomly have to wait a week for a round in a competition that already takes so long. Now if we redo all the rounds we did when you were gone, that'll take another week or so, probably, meaning this comp will take over half a month (the time swagrid waited before posting scrambles himself + the time between us finishing this event and starting to redo these rounds + the time redoing that round takes) longer than it would have usually. If that keeps happening, it's just not fun anymore.
If we don't start the next event before Sunday, I'll take control again and host in a diff thread. The schedule is very long and we can't afford random enormous breaks
To make up for the time lost, I will eliminate 2 people this round and I promise to sneak on my brothers computer to post the scrambles like I'm doing now ASAP.
 
To make up for the time lost, I will eliminate 2 people this round and I promise to sneak on my brothers computer to post the scrambles like I'm doing now ASAP.
1. That doesn't make up for the time lost, and it's not even close
2. Each round, including those when you were gone, I got first, Swagrid second and either discomantis or ethan got 3rd. It's kinda pointless to redo rounds if the results are that predictable.

I hope you understand I'm not trying to be annoying, but I really don't see a good reason to not proceed to the next event.
 
I agree (and I had a feeling this would happen lol). Let’s just do the rest of the first rounds all at once, then second rounds, and final rounds. Does this sound good to all of you?
I'm not really in favor of doing all events at once. It would be a lot harder and messier for @THE_V01DL0RD to keep up with everything and provide that many scrambles all at once. I think it's fine to do events separately, but just do maybe two rounds per event.
 
To make up for the time lost, I will eliminate 2 people this round and I promise to sneak on my brothers computer to post the scrambles like I'm doing now ASAP.
I can post scrambles if that would be needed


We also should know an approximate date for when the competition will end. It doesn't have to be exact, but it should be a general guideline for how fast the competition should go.
 
Back
Top