• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Danish Open 2010

Odder, even the obvious speedsolving way is shorter than that :D
Insert pair: U B' U2 B U' B' U B
OLL: F' L' B L' B' L2 F
PLL: F U' B U2 F' U F U2 F' B' (24 moves total, counting the cancellation)

I don't see why you orient edges if you solve the LL with OLL+PLL anyway. If you orient edges, try to do the LL with one-look or do something like in Heise method.

You could also try different ways of pairing and just play around, something like this: U L U' F U2 F' U L' B' U2 B which solves last pair+OLL and leaves only 3-corners, which you can solve with either PLL or commutator insertion. :P
 
Odder, even the obvious speedsolving way is shorter than that :D
Insert pair: U B' U2 B U' B' U B
OLL: F' L' B L' B' L2 F
PLL: F U' B U2 F' U F U2 F' B' (24 moves total, counting the cancellation)

I don't see why you orient edges if you solve the LL with OLL+PLL anyway. If you orient edges, try to do the LL with one-look or do something like in Heise method.

You could also try different ways of pairing and just play around, something like this: U L U' F U2 F' U L' B' U2 B which solves last pair+OLL and leaves only 3-corners, which you can solve with either PLL or commutator insertion. :P

I don't know full OLL ^^ So I had to do something else xD
 
Back
Top