CheescakeCuber's Roux Steps 4b-4c Alternative

00:48 <+Kirjava> why
00:48 <+Kirjava> whhhy
00:48 <+Kirjava> when anyone tried to improve roux
00:48 <+Kirjava> they always
00:49 <+Kirjava> try and do LSE in two looks
00:49 <+Kirjava> whhhy
00:49 <+Kirjava> LSE IS LIKE 0 LOOKS
00:49 <+Kirjava> AND NEAR OPTIMAL
00:49 <+Kirjava> **** ABOUT WITH SECOND BLOCK OR SOMETHING

srsly, try improving something else for once. LSE is not going to get any better anytime soon.
 
00:48 <+Kirjava> why
00:48 <+Kirjava> whhhy
00:48 <+Kirjava> when anyone tried to improve roux
00:48 <+Kirjava> they always
00:49 <+Kirjava> try and do LSE in two looks
00:49 <+Kirjava> whhhy
00:49 <+Kirjava> LSE IS LIKE 0 LOOKS
00:49 <+Kirjava> AND NEAR OPTIMAL
00:49 <+Kirjava> **** ABOUT WITH SECOND BLOCK OR SOMETHING

srsly, try improving something else for once. LSE is not going to get any better anytime soon.

Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
LSE IS LIKE 0 LOOKS
 
Recog EO before/during CMLL.

Recog UL/R during EO

Recog LL at some point before getting to it.

You can grep LSE info entirely from lookahead - giving 0 pauses for recognition.
 
The first two checked (mostly), however, I feel problems at the "Recog LL at some point before getting to it." part. So, if I get well, there isn't an exact method for that (or if is, it's "forced"), and I have to figure out what piece will go to DF (or UB) during the solving of the UL/R. Neat... Time for some random scramble experimenting!

I also feel that I have to slow down really, reeeally during these recogs... :( Like 2 TPS.
 
Sure there is. I use the 'track what's gonna be at BU' system. You find that once you get used to it and are doing it without thinking, you end up knowing the case earlier and earlier in the LSE.

Okay, one final question (for now). Is 'track what's gonna be at BU' system equivalent to the 'track what's gonna be at FD' system (i.e. to determine the 3-perm)? Since I currently look at the DF sticker to determine the final step, the latter sounds easier to me.
 
Back
Top