Yesterday I was messing with petrus method, and I had a brilliant, innovating idea (not).
1 - Cross
2 - Two adjacent F2l pairs
3 - L6E
4 - last block
5 - COLL / OLL
6 - EPLL / PLL
If you do the cross and two adjacent f2l slots, you can to L6E, you will always have the cross piece oriented, so you would check the last 6 edges and use an alg to solve it.
IMA GENIUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111one
Step 1+2 should be freestyle, the objective is to do a double x cross with 2 adjacent pairs. Do the way you want.
In the end you would do l6E with 1 edge solved on RD. That's the main (and only) advantage on this "method" (not a method.). =P
....................
The problem is: sometimes you have opposite, really easy f2l pair, but you are supposed to do adjacent pairs only.
Just wanna see what you guys think, and before commenting, just want to say again that I know its not new or inovating, its lazy petrus, like every other variation.
1 - Cross
2 - Two adjacent F2l pairs
3 - L6E
4 - last block
5 - COLL / OLL
6 - EPLL / PLL
If you do the cross and two adjacent f2l slots, you can to L6E, you will always have the cross piece oriented, so you would check the last 6 edges and use an alg to solve it.
IMA GENIUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111oneStep 1+2 should be freestyle, the objective is to do a double x cross with 2 adjacent pairs. Do the way you want.
In the end you would do l6E with 1 edge solved on RD. That's the main (and only) advantage on this "method" (not a method.). =P
....................
The problem is: sometimes you have opposite, really easy f2l pair, but you are supposed to do adjacent pairs only.
Just wanna see what you guys think, and before commenting, just want to say again that I know its not new or inovating, its lazy petrus, like every other variation.
Last edited:
