All Rounders vs Specialists

[Forcefulness]

I pretty much do everything, though I have been slacking off with skewb recently because by times have been pretty stagnant for a few months now and it's kinda demotivating.

 

[not_kevin]

Has anyone tried using KinchRanks to look at this? Lower standard deviation of KinchRanks = more of an all-rounder (in theory). I get 19.5 over all events, 13.8 when I exclude events I haven't competed in. I may post this in the stats or KinchRanks thread if it doesn't get much attention here.

When I saw Myachii's idea, I immediately thought of using KinchRanks as a possibly more uniform metric (if not necessarily as illuminating) - seeing what fraction you are to the world record makes it easy to compare all events against each other, although it removes the hard numbers that Myachii gets.

Using this, I found that my standard deviation was 25.36, and 21.48 excluding the two events that are 0 for me (feet and 5bld). However, I know one of my big weaknesses is BLD, due to lack of motivation - excluding those, my standard deviation drops to 11.94

So overall, I'm fairly well-rounded other than BLD and feet, with clear focuses in FMC and Square-1. So I still don't know what camp I fall under XD