Search results

the first step is made inflexible so it is easier to one look the back block with being able to locate other pieces for the next step. i honestly don't see why you think building a 3/4 cross will be better than the way I'm doing it. the finger tricks are actually good for the third step the...

the reason i don't use eo is so i have more ways to make the squares. this barely reduces the movecount, but more importantly, increases useful finger tricks for last layer many of the oll cases can be mirrored or right front inverted to get a different case with the same speed. the question is...

this method is based on all the research i have learned, and i believe it has enough efficiency, lookahead and tps with a small enough alg count to be the fastest method i can make. so all i have to do is get good at the method and learn the algorithms.

the final method I'm proposing (SBOPP)(squares-block-orient+phase-pll) 1) solve an edge piece in DB 2) solve the two 2x2x1 blocks in BLD and BRD 3) solve the first two layers using intuition while locating and tracking the edge phasing for the next step 4 26/27) solve oll and phase the edges...

solving adgacent corners will get the algorithm count to above 1000, if you dont look at the other corners. the skip chance after this will still be 1/8 and will have better algs for the second set. some (random) algs i just found (http://birdflu.lar5.com/?pos=____&list=algs) (picked the best of...

the 1/12 is not a pll skip, it is called an epll skip, but i wanted to check other ways to solve ll before really learning algs. in ollcp there are many bad algorithms due to long swaps, but making corners only half solved in ollpp removes most of the long algorithms. i do not know if new long...

i believe that a good alg set is one that covers as many good algs as possible, while minimizing the amount of bad algorithms. the fact that the algs for this method is determined by all aspects of last layer makes it so that less of the faster algorithms are missed. to prevent longer...

new ll method OLLPP 1) solve oll while phasing both edges and corners using 1/509 algs (phasing corners is forcing a solved or diagonal corner permutation). 2) then solve the rest using 1/5 algs. this includes a 1/8 skip chance and a 1/8 H-perm.

you could solve it like m-cell if you want you never place a wrong edge in this method. it says "any D layer edge piece in place". it never says put it in any place. it means solve the D-edge i have never heard that saying, so i don't know it. this is not a good comparison. 1/15552 is too...

are you really paid for making and calculating the usefulness of new methods. all the cases are the same either y-rotated or mirrored or both. there is none better than another. this step is not awkward at all. after you complete the previous step you are left with the same as if you are using...

i do not see any flaws with my methed and you're not a pro. you do not get paid for doing this. this is not a pro tip.

you will have to track one pair and hope another jumps right into your vision two seconds is a really long time for speedsolving it must just be the way I'm forming the sides then

zz too many regrips for f2l pinkie pie roux reducing to <M2,U> too early is less efficient

petrus oriente edges takes too long too recognize roux trying to top pcms L8e is hard to navigate m-cell trying to top freefop 2x3x3 block cant be seen from inspection for ollep i am tracking ep from the last step. it's suprisingly easy so far

i don't like cfop f2l, it is not flexible enough you have to track each individual edge, or track them like 3 gen cp tracking, knowing witch 2 have to swap, and what happens to the swap for every possible move. edge permutation has a 1/4 chance to involve looking at 3 sides (if you dont know...

i am solving f2l this way so that if one pair is bad you could solve the other two. you track the ep so you can just look at the oll and already know the ep the full ollcp/ollep will take too long to calculate, but epll is better than cpll. (both have the same skip chance)

new method (BPSL) 1) 2x2x2 block create a 2x2x2 block in DBL 2) pairs a) build 2 of the 3 f2l pairs b (if adjacent when solved) place the two pairs along with the shared edge piece ---(if not adjacent when solved) place the two pairs and any D layer edge piece in place 3) square solve f2l...

the speed optimal alg for this is R' U R U F' U R' U R F U F' U F but+18 for f2l and +1 for auf, and you get 38 htm (37 with cancelations)

the speed optimal ll solution for mine is R' U L' U2 R U' R' U2 L R -- R u R2 U' R' U' R U2 R2 u' U' R' -- U2 37 htm, 33 atm

the reason is that eo is already solved, compared to if its not.