Search results

wouldn't a comp with only 75 competitors only require like half of the time you allowed for events? Also if walker doesn't wanna, James Hildreth is another person to contact.

If I were you i'd get everything in place as soon as you can even if it's in august. it will make it much more successful because you'll have plenty of time to adjust to make it absolutely perfect. P.S. my prefered events (probably identical to yours) 2x2 3x3 skewb pyra FMC (but only like one...

well according to the state rankings and people i've met the best events go somewhat like this... 2x2 skewb 3x3 pyra and then all the other events

does this mean you'll have fmc at your comp this summer? cuz it would be cool to compete in even though i avg like ~40ish moves. What events do you plan on anyway?

i see thanks for the advice, i should crush week 8 then....

yeah but none of those have 2x2 or pyra plus nobody will want to go to a comp right after nats. I would cuz i can't go to nats but other people wouldn't... i'd say late may at the start of summer vacation is the perfect time to do it...

4 mover (would've been faster if i had finger tricked better) 35. 0.72 U' F2 U2 R F' R2 U F2 R2

best single for somebody with a non sub-20 avg?

here's a pdf https://www.speedsolving.com/forum/search/1008613/?q=penguins+don%27t+fly&o=date lol...

well done young grasshopper jk i've never even hosted a comp :p

why is that?

that moment when 2 cubers with sub-8 avgs don't compete and then jabari flops at skewb... (just happened).

when/where I'd totally be there, I can scramble and stuff I know another kid who could scramble plus like 4 other who'd compete...

wow I've dropped over 1:10 on 5x5... anyone planning comps near STL currently?

Week 8:F2 U' R2 D2 R2 U R2 B2 R' F' L U2 B2 D' B D2 B' F2 sorry for the delay guys...

Mini Guildford: 6:59.84 7x7: 9:58.76, 9:55.42, 9:38.02 = 9:50.73 PB Sniggle (but considering how little 7x7 i do I get a pb every like 12 solves)

I can see how this would apply to finals and events with very few competitors, but the cubers outnumber the scramblers so wouldn't they be receiving cubes faster than they scramble them?

Um, I don't see your point, considering scramblers are technically behind the rate of solving due to having to wait for a competitor to solve in order to receive a cube for scrambling. If I'm missing your point please re-explain but I really do think that scrambling this way could allow for an...

My mind was just blown, chris tran has once again revolutionized cubing I did the math and if runners and scramblers did this at a comp with approx. 2000 solves (about a 100 person comp) it could save up to 76 minutes! that's an hour and a quarter!

criticize all you want only I and my friends know the truth. Btw I used some anti-CLL and EG-1, there was also 2 LL skips in that avg both sub-1. and lot's of other ridiculous scrambles. also I avged six because I plus 2ed multiple times would've been a 3 avg otherwise.